FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1684   1685   1686   1687   1688   1689   1690   1691   1692   1693   1694   1695   1696   1697   1698   1699   1700   1701   1702   1703   1704   1705   1706   1707   1708  
1709   1710   1711   1712   1713   1714   1715   1716   1717   1718   1719   1720   1721   1722   1723   1724   1725   1726   1727   1728   1729   1730   1731   1732   1733   >>   >|  
cumstances Mr. Littleton sent for Mr. O'Connell on the 20th of June, and made the desired communication, with an assurance that only a short measure for repressing agrarian disturbances would be proposed: and, also, that if the coercion bill was again thought necessary, he would not introduce it. In consequence of this interview, Mr. O'Connell promised his assistance in putting down disturbances; and he actually withdrew the repeal candidate whom he had started for the county of Wexford. To the dismay of Mr. Littleton, however, the premier and majority of the cabinet determined to retain the clause respecting public meetings, and he was compelled to belie his confidential communication. He had told Mr. O'Connell that he would not be the person to introduce the bill in that shape: and yet he did not resign when it was determined that the bill should be introduced in that shape alone. At the same time he communicated to Mr. O'Connell that his hopes could not be realised; but begged him to take no public notice of this until he should have seen Earl Grey's speech introducing the bill. Mr. O'Connell replied to him, that if he did not resign, he would be guilty of deception; and Mr. Littleton answered, "Say nothing of that to-day," or, "Wait till to-morrow." But with regard to the fact, whether such an answer was or was not given, both O'Connell and Mr. Littleton averred that what the other stated was not consistent with truth. Be this as it may, O'Connell thought he was not bound to secrecy; and on the 3rd of July, two days after the bill had been introduced in the lords, he asked Mr. Littleton whether it was true that the renewal of the coercion bill in its present shape had been advised and called for by the Irish government? Mr. Littleton answered that this was an unusual inquiry to make respecting a bill not before the house; but he would say that the introduction of the bill had the entire sanction of the Irish government. Mr. O'Connell again put his question, as to whether the bill had been called for by the Irish government? and not obtaining a more direct answer, he said, "I now ask the Irish secretary if it his intention to bring the bill forward in this house?" Mr. Littleton replied, "It will be for the government to decide as to its introduction here when the proper time arrives; but, whoever may bring in the bill, I shall vote for it." Mr. O'Connell then said, "Then I have been exceedingly deceived by him;" and t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1684   1685   1686   1687   1688   1689   1690   1691   1692   1693   1694   1695   1696   1697   1698   1699   1700   1701   1702   1703   1704   1705   1706   1707   1708  
1709   1710   1711   1712   1713   1714   1715   1716   1717   1718   1719   1720   1721   1722   1723   1724   1725   1726   1727   1728   1729   1730   1731   1732   1733   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Connell

 

Littleton

 
government
 

determined

 

introduction

 

coercion

 

answered

 

replied

 

respecting

 

resign


introduced

 
public
 
called
 

disturbances

 
communication
 
introduce
 

answer

 

thought

 

stated

 

consistent


averred

 

secrecy

 

regard

 

sanction

 

decide

 

proper

 

secretary

 

intention

 

forward

 
arrives

exceedingly

 

deceived

 
unusual
 

inquiry

 

advised

 
present
 

renewal

 
obtaining
 

direct

 
question

entire

 

realised

 

withdrew

 
repeal
 

candidate

 

promised

 
assistance
 

putting

 

started

 
premier