FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1613   1614   1615   1616   1617   1618   1619   1620   1621   1622   1623   1624   1625   1626   1627   1628   1629   1630   1631   1632   1633   1634   1635   1636   1637  
1638   1639   1640   1641   1642   1643   1644   1645   1646   1647   1648   1649   1650   1651   1652   1653   1654   1655   1656   1657   1658   1659   1660   1661   1662   >>   >|  
ously endeavoured to draw over to their side, so as to acquire in it a counterpoise to the democracy. Thus courted on both sides the moneyed lords did not neglect to turn their advantageous position to profit, and to have the only one of their former privileges which they had not yet regained--the fourteen benches reserved for the equestrian order in the theatre--now (687) restored to them by decree of the people. On the whole, without abruptly breaking with the democracy, they again drew closer to the government. The very relations of the senate to Crassus and his clients point in this direction; but a better understanding between the senate and the moneyed aristocracy seems to have been chiefly brought about by the fact, that in 686 the senate withdrew from Lucius Lucullus the ablest of the senatorial officers, at the instance of the capitalists whom he had sorely annoyed, the dministration of the province of Asia so important for their purposes.(8) The Events in the East, and Their Reaction on Rome But while the factions of the capital were indulging in their wonted mutual quarrels, which they were never able to bring to any proper decision, events in the east followed their fatal course, as we have already described; and it was these events that brought the dilatory course of the politics of the capital to a crisis. The war both by land and by sea had there taken a most unfavourable turn. In the beginning of 687 the Pontic army of the Romans was destroyed, and their Armenian army was utterly breaking up on its retreat; all their conquests were lost, the sea was exclusively in the power of the pirates, and the price of grain in Italy was thereby so raised that they were afraid of an actual famine. No doubt, as we saw, the faults of the generals, especially the utter incapacity of the admiral Marcus Antonius and the temerity of the otherwise able Lucius Lucullus, were in part the occasion of these calamities; no doubt also the democracy had by its revolutionary agitations materially contributed to the breaking up of the Armenian army. But of course the government was now held cumulatively responsible for all the mischief which itself and others had occasioned, and the indignant hungry multitude desired only an opportunity to settle accounts with the senate. Reappearance of Pompeius It was a decisive crisis. The oligarchy, though degraded and disarmed, was not yet overthrown, for the management of public
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1613   1614   1615   1616   1617   1618   1619   1620   1621   1622   1623   1624   1625   1626   1627   1628   1629   1630   1631   1632   1633   1634   1635   1636   1637  
1638   1639   1640   1641   1642   1643   1644   1645   1646   1647   1648   1649   1650   1651   1652   1653   1654   1655   1656   1657   1658   1659   1660   1661   1662   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

senate

 

breaking

 
democracy
 

Lucius

 

Lucullus

 

events

 

government

 

brought

 

crisis

 

capital


moneyed

 
Armenian
 
exclusively
 

raised

 
conquests
 
pirates
 

Pontic

 

dilatory

 

politics

 

afraid


Romans

 

destroyed

 

utterly

 

beginning

 

unfavourable

 

retreat

 

temerity

 

multitude

 

hungry

 
desired

opportunity

 

settle

 
indignant
 

occasioned

 

responsible

 
mischief
 

accounts

 
Reappearance
 

disarmed

 
overthrown

management

 

public

 

degraded

 
Pompeius
 

decisive

 

oligarchy

 
cumulatively
 

incapacity

 

admiral

 
Marcus