FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1649   1650   1651   1652   1653   1654   1655   1656   1657   1658   1659   1660   1661   1662   1663   1664   1665   1666   1667   1668   1669   1670   1671   1672   1673  
1674   1675   1676   1677   1678   1679   1680   1681   1682   1683   1684   1685   1686   1687   1688   1689   1690   1691   1692   1693   1694   1695   1696   1697   1698   >>   >|  
aeans. King Aretas had indeed, yielding to the desire of the Romans, evacuated Judaea; but Damascus was still in his hands, and the Nabataean land had not yet been trodden by any Roman soldier. To subdue that region or at least to show to their new neighbours in Arabia that the Roman eagles were now dominant on the Orontes and on the Jordan, and that the time had gone by when any one was free to levy contributions in the Syrian lands as a domain without a master, Pompeius began in 691 an expedition against Petra; but detained by the revolt of the Jews, which broke out during this expedition, he was not reluctant to leave to his successor Marcus Scaurus the carrying out of the difficult enterprise against the Nabataean city situated far off amidst the desert.(18) In reality Scaurus also soon found himself compelled to return without having accomplished his object. He had to content himself with making war on the Nabataeans in the deserts on the left bank of the Jordan, where he could lean for support on the Jews, but yet bore off only very trifling successes. Ultimately the adroit Jewish minister Antipater from Idumaea persuaded Aretas to purchase a guarantee for all his possessions, Damascus included, from the Roman governor for a sum of money; and this is the peace celebrated on the coins of Scaurus, where king Aretas appears--leading his camel-- as a suppliant offering the olive branch to the Roman. Difficulty with the Parthians Far more fraught with momentous effects than these new relations of the Romans to the Armenians, Iberians, Bosporans, and Nabataeans was the proximity into which through the occupation of Syria they were brought with the Parthian state. Complaisant as had been the demeanour of Roman diplomacy towards Phraates while the Pontic and Armenian states still subsisted, willingly as both Lucullus and Pompeius had then conceded to him the possession of the regions beyond the Euphrates,(19) the new neighbour now sternly took up his position by the side of the Arsacids; and Phraates, if the royal art of forgetting his own faults allowed him, might well recall now the warning words of Mithradates that the Parthian by his alliance with the Occidentals against the kingdoms of kindred race paved the way first for their destruction and then for his own. Romans and Parthians in league had brought Armenia to ruin; when it was overthrown, Rome true to her old policy now reversed the parts and favoured
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1649   1650   1651   1652   1653   1654   1655   1656   1657   1658   1659   1660   1661   1662   1663   1664   1665   1666   1667   1668   1669   1670   1671   1672   1673  
1674   1675   1676   1677   1678   1679   1680   1681   1682   1683   1684   1685   1686   1687   1688   1689   1690   1691   1692   1693   1694   1695   1696   1697   1698   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Scaurus

 
Aretas
 

Romans

 

Jordan

 

Nabataeans

 

expedition

 

Pompeius

 

Parthian

 

brought

 

Parthians


Damascus

 

Nabataean

 

Phraates

 

states

 

Armenian

 

diplomacy

 

demeanour

 

Pontic

 

Complaisant

 

Iberians


offering

 

branch

 

Difficulty

 

suppliant

 

celebrated

 

appears

 

leading

 

fraught

 
Bosporans
 

favoured


proximity

 

subsisted

 
Armenians
 

effects

 

momentous

 

relations

 

occupation

 

neighbour

 

alliance

 

Occidentals


kingdoms

 

kindred

 
Mithradates
 

recall

 

warning

 
Armenia
 

overthrown

 

league

 

destruction

 
allowed