FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1691   1692   1693   1694   1695   1696   1697   1698   1699   1700   1701   1702   1703   1704   1705   1706   1707   1708   1709   1710   1711   1712   1713   1714   1715  
1716   1717   1718   1719   1720   1721   1722   1723   1724   1725   1726   1727   1728   1729   1730   1731   1732   1733   1734   1735   1736   1737   1738   1739   1740   >>   >|  
the officers and the general himself had, when all was lost, thrown themselves headlong on the enemy and thus sought and found death (beginning of 692). Antonius was on account of this victory stamped by the senate with the title of Imperator, and new thanksgiving-festivals showed that the government and the governed were beginning to become accustomed to civil war. Attitude of Crassus and Caesar toward the Anarchists The anarchist plot had thus been suppressed in the capital as in Italy with bloody violence; people were still reminded of it merely by the criminal processes which in the Etruscan country towns and in the capital thinned the ranks of those affiliated to the beaten party, and by the large accessions to the robber-bands of Italy-- one of which, for instance, formed out of the remains of the armies of Spartacus and Catilina, was destroyed by a military force in 694 in the territory of Thurii. But it is important to keep in view that the blow fell by no means merely on the anarchists proper, who had conspired to set the capital on fire and had fought at Pistoria, but on the whole democratic party. That this party, and in particular Crassus and Caesar, had a hand in the game on the present occasion as well as in the plot of 688, may be regarded--not in a juristic, but in a historical, point of view-- as an ascertained fact. The circumstance, indeed, that Catulus and the other heads of the senatorial party accused the leader of the democrats of complicity in the anarchist plot, and that the latter as senator spoke and voted against the brutal judicial murder contemplated by the oligarchy, could only be urged by partisan sophistry as any valid proof of his participation in the plans of Catilina. But a series of other facts is of more weight. According to express and irrefragable testimonies it was especially Crassus and Caesar that supported the candidature of Catilina for the consulship. When Caesar in 690 brought the executioners of Sulla before the commission for murder(20) he allowed the rest to be condemned, but the most guilty and infamous of all, Catilina, to be acquitted. In the revelations of the 3rd of December, it is true, Cicero did not include among the names of the conspirators of whom he had information those of the two influential men; but it is notorious that the informers denounced not merely those against whom subsequently investigation was directed, but "many innocent" persons be
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1691   1692   1693   1694   1695   1696   1697   1698   1699   1700   1701   1702   1703   1704   1705   1706   1707   1708   1709   1710   1711   1712   1713   1714   1715  
1716   1717   1718   1719   1720   1721   1722   1723   1724   1725   1726   1727   1728   1729   1730   1731   1732   1733   1734   1735   1736   1737   1738   1739   1740   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Caesar

 

Catilina

 
Crassus
 

capital

 

murder

 

beginning

 

anarchist

 

sophistry

 

participation

 

series


partisan

 
brutal
 
circumstance
 

Catulus

 
ascertained
 
regarded
 

juristic

 

historical

 

senatorial

 

accused


judicial

 

contemplated

 

senator

 

leader

 

democrats

 

complicity

 

oligarchy

 

brought

 

include

 
conspirators

information

 

Cicero

 
revelations
 

December

 

influential

 
directed
 

innocent

 
persons
 

investigation

 
subsequently

notorious

 

informers

 

denounced

 
acquitted
 

supported

 

candidature

 
consulship
 

testimonies

 

weight

 
According