FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1618   1619   1620   1621   1622   1623   1624   1625   1626   1627   1628   1629   1630   1631   1632   1633   1634   1635   1636   1637   1638   1639   1640   1641   1642  
1643   1644   1645   1646   1647   1648   1649   1650   1651   1652   1653   1654   1655   1656   1657   1658   1659   1660   1661   1662   1663   1664   1665   1666   1667   >>   >|  
the pirates and only longed for domestic repose, were meant in earnest, there was probably this much of truth in them, that the bold and active client, who was in confidential intercourse with Pompeius and his more immediate circle and who completely saw through the situation and the men, took the decision to a considerable extent out of the hands of his shortsighted and resourceless patron. The Parties in Relation to the Gabinian Laws The democracy, discontented as its leaders might be in secret, could not well come publicly forward against the project of law. It would, to all appearance, have been in no case able to hinder the carrying of the law; but it would by opposition have openly broken with Pompeius and thereby compelled him either to make approaches to the oligarchy or regardlessly to pursue his personal policy in the face of both parties. No course was left to the democrats but still even now to adhere to their alliance with Pompeius, hollow as it was, and to embrace the present opportunity of at least definitely overthrowing the senate and passing over from opposition into government, leaving the ulterior issue to the future and to the well-known weakness of Pompeius' character. Accordingly their leaders--the praetor Lucius Quinctius, the same who seven years before had exerted himself for the restoration of the tribunician power,(11) and the former quaestor Gaius Caesar-- supported the Gabinian proposals. The privileged classes were furious--not merely the nobility, but also the mercantile aristocracy, which felt its exclusive rights endangered by so thorough a state-revolution and once more recognized its true patron in the senate. When the tribune Gabinius after the introduction of his proposals appeared in the senate-house, the fathers of the city were almost on the point of strangling him with their own hands, without considering in their zeal how extremely disadvantageous for them this method of arguing must have ultimately proved. The tribune escaped to the Forum and summoned the multitude to storm the senate-house, when just at the right time the sitting terminated. The consul Piso, the champion of the oligarchy, who accidentally fell into the hands of the multitude, would have certainly become a victim to popular fury, had not Gabinius come up and, in order that his certain success might not be endangered by unseasonable acts of violence, liberated the consul. Meanwhile the exasperation
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1618   1619   1620   1621   1622   1623   1624   1625   1626   1627   1628   1629   1630   1631   1632   1633   1634   1635   1636   1637   1638   1639   1640   1641   1642  
1643   1644   1645   1646   1647   1648   1649   1650   1651   1652   1653   1654   1655   1656   1657   1658   1659   1660   1661   1662   1663   1664   1665   1666   1667   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

senate

 

Pompeius

 
multitude
 

leaders

 

proposals

 

Gabinian

 

patron

 

endangered

 

oligarchy

 

tribune


Gabinius

 
consul
 
opposition
 

recognized

 
rights
 
Quinctius
 

revolution

 

mercantile

 

quaestor

 

Caesar


exerted

 

tribunician

 

supported

 

privileged

 

restoration

 

aristocracy

 

nobility

 

classes

 

furious

 
introduction

exclusive

 

extremely

 
accidentally
 

victim

 

champion

 
sitting
 

terminated

 
popular
 

violence

 
liberated

Meanwhile

 

exasperation

 

unseasonable

 
success
 

strangling

 

fathers

 
Lucius
 

escaped

 

summoned

 
proved