FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223  
224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   >>   >|  
r should also be included in the sphere of Ianus, especially after Ianuarius came to be placed at its head. 5. I. IV. Tities and Luceres 6. I. VI. Amalgamation of the Palatine and Quirinal Cities 7. I. VII. Servian Wall 8. I. III. Latium 9. I. VII. Relation of Rome to Latium 10. I. V. Burdens of the Burgesses, I. XI. Crimes 11. The clearest evidence of this is the fact, that in the communities organized on the Latin scheme augurs and Pontifices occur everywhere (e. g. Cic. de Lege Agr. ii. 35, 96, and numerous inscriptions), as does likewise the -pater patratus- of the Fetiales in Laurentum (Orelli, 2276), but the other colleges do not. The former, therefore, stand on the same footing with the constitution of ten curies and the Flamines, Salii, and Luperci, as very ancient heirlooms of the Latin stock; whereas the Duoviri -sacris faciundis-, and the other colleges, like the thirty curies and the Servian tribes and centuries, originated in, and remained therefore confined to, Rome. But in the case of the second college--the pontifices--the influence of Rome probably led to the introduction of that name into the general Latin scheme instead of some earlier--perhaps more than one--designation; or--a hypothesis which philologically has much in its favour-- -pons- originally signified not "bridge," but "way" generally, and -pontifex- therefore meant "constructor of ways." The statements regarding the original number of the augurs in particular vary. The view that it was necessary for the number to be an odd one is refuted by Cicero (de Lege Agr. ii. 35, 96); and Livy (x. 6) does not say so, but only states that the number of Roman augurs had to be divisible by three, and so must have had an odd number as its basis. According to Livy (l. c.) the number was six down to the Ogulnian law, and the same is virtually affirmed by Cicero (de Rep. ii. 9, 14) when he represents Romulus as instituting four, and Numa two, augural stalls. On the number of the pontifices comp. Staatsrecht, ii. 20. 12. It is only an unreflecting misconception that can discover in this usage a reminiscence of ancient human sacrifices. 13. I. XII. Nature of the Roman Gods 14. I. XII. Priests 15. -Sors- from -serere-, to place in row. The -sortes- were probably small wooden tablets arranged upon a string, which when thrown formed figures of various kinds; an arrangement which puts one in mind of the Runi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223  
224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
number
 

augurs

 

scheme

 

Cicero

 

curies

 

colleges

 

ancient

 

Latium

 

Servian

 
pontifices

According

 

constructor

 

signified

 

Ogulnian

 

originally

 

bridge

 

generally

 
pontifex
 
refuted
 
states

original

 

divisible

 

statements

 

instituting

 

Priests

 

serere

 

Nature

 

reminiscence

 
sacrifices
 

arranged


tablets
 
formed
 

string

 
wooden
 
figures
 
sortes
 

discover

 

thrown

 
Romulus
 
represents

virtually
 

affirmed

 

augural

 
arrangement
 
unreflecting
 

misconception

 

stalls

 

Staatsrecht

 

influence

 

Crimes