FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40  
41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   >>   >|  
Here we pause to interject a reflection. Ordinary Christians believe in body and soul; Professor Stokes believes in body, soul, and spirit. That is, he says man is made up of three instead of two. But in step our Theosophic friends, who pile on four more, and tell us that man is sevenfold. Now who is right! According to their own account they are _all_ right. But this is impossible. In our opinion they are all _wrong_. Their theories are imaginary. All they _know_ anything of is the human body. But to return to Professor Stokes's excursion in the region of Biblical exegesis. Never have we met with anything more puerile and absurd. He finds "soul" and "spirit" in the English Bible, and he supposes them to be different things. He even builds up a fanciful theory on the fact that the expression "living soul" occurs in the New Testament, but he does not remember the expression "living spirit." Hence he concludes that _spirit_ is not "living" but "life-making." Surely a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, and Professor Stokes is a capital illustration of this truth. We get "soul" and "spirit" in the New Testament, as well as in the Old, simply because both words are used indifferently by the English translators. This is owing to the composite character of the English language. One word comes from the Greek, the other from the Latin, and both mean exactly the same thing. The Hebrew _ruach_, the (Greek _pneuma_), and the Latin _spiritus_, all originally meant _the breath_; and as breathing was the most obvious function of life, persisting even in the deepest sleep, it came to signify _life_, when that general conception was reached; and when the idea of soul or spirit was reached, the same word was used to denote it. All this is shown clearly enough by Tylor, and is corroborated by the more orthodox Max Muller; so that Professor Stokes has fallen into a quagmire, made of the dirt of ignorance and a little water of knowledge, and has made himself a laughing-stock to everyone who possesses a decent acquaintance with the subject. Whatever it is that Professor Stokes thinks a man has apart from his body, he does not believe it to be immortal. The immortality of the soul and a future life, he says, are "two totally different things." The one he thinks "incorrect," the other he regards as guaranteed by Scripture; in other words, by Paul, who begins his exposition by exclaiming "Thou fool!" and ends it by showing his own fo
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40  
41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
spirit
 

Professor

 

Stokes

 

living

 

English

 

Testament

 
knowledge
 
things
 
reached
 

expression


thinks

 

general

 

conception

 
deepest
 

breath

 

breathing

 

Hebrew

 

originally

 

spiritus

 

obvious


pneuma

 

function

 

persisting

 

signify

 
totally
 

incorrect

 

future

 

immortality

 
subject
 

Whatever


immortal

 

guaranteed

 
Scripture
 

showing

 
exclaiming
 

begins

 

exposition

 

acquaintance

 
decent
 

corroborated


orthodox
 
Muller
 

denote

 

fallen

 

laughing

 

possesses

 
quagmire
 

ignorance

 

Surely

 

opinion