FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643  
644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   >>   >|  
maginative contemplations on the phenomena of burials and graves; spectres seen in dreams; conceptions of the dead as shadowy shapes in the under world; ideas of God as the deliverer of living men from the open gates of the under world when they experienced narrow escapes from destruction; vast and fanatical national hopes. Before advancing another step, it is necessary only to premise that some of the Jews appear to have expected that the souls on rising from the under world would be clothed with new, spiritualized, incorruptible bodies, others plainly expected that the identical bodies they formerly wore would be literally restored. Now, when Christianity, after the death of its Founder, arose and spread, it was in the guise of a new and progressive Jewish sect. Its apostles and its converts for the first hundred years were Christian Jews. Christianity ran its career through the apostolic age virtually as a more liberal Jewish sect. Most natural was it, then, that infant Christianity should retain all the salient dogmas of Judaism, except those of exclusive nationality and bigoted formalism in the throwing off of which the mission of Christianity partly consisted. Among these Jewish dogmas retained by early Christianity was that of the bodily resurrection. In the New Testament itself there are seeming references to this doctrine. We shall soon recur to these. The phrase "resurrection of the body" does not occur in the Scriptures. Neither is it found in any public creed whatever among Christians until the fourth century.6 But these admissions by no means prove that the doctrine was not believed from the earliest days of Christianity. The fact is, it was the same with this doctrine as with the doctrine of the descent of Christ into Hades: it was not for a long time called in question at all. It was not defined, discriminated, lifted up on the symbols of the Church, because that was not called for. As soon as the doctrine came into dispute, it was vehemently and all but unanimously affirmed, and found an emphatic place in every creed. Whenever the doctrine of a bodily resurrection has been denied, that denial has been instantly stigmatized as heresy and schism, even from the days of "Hymeneus and Philetas, who concerning the truth erred, saying that the resurrection was past already." The uniform orthodox doctrine of the Christian Church has always been that in the last day the identical fleshly bodies formerly inhab
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643  
644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
doctrine
 

Christianity

 

resurrection

 

bodies

 

Jewish

 

identical

 
Church
 

expected

 

Christian

 

called


bodily
 

dogmas

 

earliest

 
believed
 
admissions
 
phrase
 

references

 
Christians
 

fourth

 

century


Scriptures

 

Neither

 

public

 

discriminated

 

Hymeneus

 
Philetas
 

schism

 
heresy
 

denied

 

denial


instantly

 

stigmatized

 

fleshly

 

orthodox

 
uniform
 

Whenever

 
defined
 

Testament

 

lifted

 

question


Christ

 

symbols

 

affirmed

 
emphatic
 

unanimously

 
dispute
 
vehemently
 

descent

 
premise
 
advancing