FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654  
655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   >>   >|  
and when she threw it on the ground, an angel restored it to its original nature and place in the body of the martyred hero, that lion of God. The Roman Catholic Church endorses the representation that the body must be raised to be punished. In the Catechism of the Council of Trent, which is an authoritative exposition of Romanist theology, we read that the "identical body" shall be restored, though "without deformities or superfluities;" restored that "as it was a partner in the man's deeds, so it may be a partner in his punishments." The same Catechism also gives in this connection the reason why a general judgment is necessary after each individual has been judged at his death, namely, this: that they may be punished for the evil which has resulted in the world since they died from the evil they did in the world while they lived! Is it not astonishing how these theologians find out so much? A living Presbyterian divine of note says, "The bodies of the damned in the resurrection shall be fit dwellings for their vile minds. With all those fearful and horrid expressions which every base and malignant passion wakes up in the human countenance stamped upon it for eternity and burned in by the flaming fury of their own terrific wickedness, they will be condemned to look upon their own deformity and to feel their fitting doom." It is therefore urged that the body must be raised to suffer the just penalty of the sins man committed while occupying it. Is it not an absurdity to affirm that nerves and blood, flesh and bones, are responsible, guilty, must be punished? Tucker, in his "Light of Nature Pursued," says, "The vulgar notion of a resurrection in the same form and substance we carry about at present, because the body being partaker in the deed ought to share in the reward, as well requires a resurrection of the sword a man murders with, or the bank note he gives to charitable uses." We suppose an intelligent personality, a free will, indispensable to responsibleness and alone amenable to retributions. Besides, if the body must be raised to undergo chastisement for the offences done in it and by means of it, this insurmountable difficulty by the same logic confronts us. The material of our bodies is in a constant change, the particles becoming totally transferred every few years. Now, when a man is punished after the general judgment for a certain crime, he must be in the very body he occupied when that crime was perp
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   653   654  
655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
punished
 

restored

 

raised

 

resurrection

 

judgment

 

partner

 
general
 

bodies

 

Catechism

 

substance


notion
 

Nature

 

Pursued

 
vulgar
 
reward
 
requires
 

Tucker

 
partaker
 

present

 

responsible


suffer

 

penalty

 

fitting

 

committed

 

murders

 
nerves
 

occupying

 
absurdity
 

affirm

 

guilty


martyred

 

constant

 

change

 

particles

 
material
 

difficulty

 
confronts
 

totally

 

nature

 

occupied


transferred

 

insurmountable

 

suppose

 
intelligent
 

personality

 
deformity
 
charitable
 

indispensable

 
responsibleness
 
undergo