FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443  
444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   >>   >|  
ge, or to give notice that the charge will be preferred, on the first seasonable opportunity, instead of lulling the offender into security, and disarming him in his defence, by allowing the time to run on so long as to render him incapable of bringing forward his witnesses. I take the liberty of calling this to your attention, and shall now proceed to answer the charges which have been brought against me. "I am accused of having held a conversation with an inferior officer on the quarter-deck of his Majesty's brig _Rattlesnake_, in which my captain was treated with contempt. That it may not be supposed that Mr Swinburne was a new acquaintance, made upon my joining the brig, I must observe that he was an old shipmate, with whom I had served many years, and with whose worth I was well acquainted. He was my instructor in my more youthful days, and has been rewarded for his merit, with the warrant which he now holds as gunner of His Majesty's brig _Rattlesnake_. The offensive observation, in the first place, was not mine; and, in the second, it was couched in general terms. Here Mr Swinburne has pointedly confessed that _he_ did refer to the captain, although the observation was in the plural; but that does not prove the charge against me--on the contrary, adds weight to the assertion of Mr Swinburne, that I was guiltless of the present charge. That Captain Hawkins has acted as a spy, his own evidence on this charge, as well as that brought forward by other witnesses, will decidedly prove; but as the truth of the observation does not warrant the utterance, I am glad that no such expression escaped my lips. "Upon the second charge I shall dwell but a short time. It is true that there is a general order that no stoves shall be alight after a certain hour; but I will appeal to the honourable court, whether a first lieutenant is not considered to have a degree of licence of judgment in all that concerns the interior discipline of the ship. The surgeon sent to say that a stove was required for one of the sick. I was in bed at the time, and replied immediately in the affirmative. Does Captain Hawkins mean to assert to the honourable court, that he would have refused the request of the surgeon? Most certainly not. The only error I committed, if it were an error, was not going through the form of awaking Captain Hawkins, to ask the permission, which, as first lieutenant, I thought myself authorized to give. "The charge again
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443  
444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

charge

 

Captain

 
Swinburne
 

Hawkins

 

observation

 

warrant

 

Majesty

 

general

 

Rattlesnake

 

honourable


lieutenant

 
captain
 
surgeon
 

witnesses

 
forward
 

brought

 

escaped

 

expression

 

committed

 

utterance


thought

 

present

 

authorized

 

assertion

 
guiltless
 

awaking

 
decidedly
 

evidence

 

permission

 

immediately


weight

 
affirmative
 

discipline

 

assert

 

required

 
replied
 

interior

 
appeal
 

stoves

 

alight


considered

 

degree

 
refused
 

concerns

 

request

 
licence
 

judgment

 
proceed
 

answer

 

charges