FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161  
162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   >>   >|  
on of others, but rather their unnecessary understanding; who, like SANCHO PANZA's Doctor, prescribe too strictly to our appetites. For_, says he, _in the difference of Tragedy and Comedy and of Farce itself; there can be no determination but by the taste; nor in the manner of their composure_. We shall see him, now, as great a Critic as he was a Poet: and the reason why he excelled so much in Poetry will be evident; for it will have proceeded from the exactness of his Judgement. _In the difference of Tragedy, Comedy, and Farce itself; there can be no determination but by the taste_. I will not quarrel with the obscurity of this phrase, though I justly might: but beg his pardon, if I do not rightly understand him. If he means that there is no essential difference betwixt Comedy, Tragedy, and Farce; but only what is made by people's taste, which distinguishes one of them from the other: that is so manifest an error, that I need lose no time to contradict it. Were there neither Judge, Taste, or Opinion in the world; yet they would differ in their natures. For the Action, Character, and Language of Tragedy would still be great and high: that of Comedy, lower and more familiar. Admiration would be the Delight of the one: Satire, of the other. I have but briefly touched upon these things; because, whatever his words are, I can scarce[ly] imagine that _he who is always concerned for the true honour of Reason, and would have no spurious issue fathered upon her_ [p. 578], should mean anything so absurd, as to affirm _that there is no difference between Comedy and Tragedy, but what is made by taste only_: unless he would have us understand the Comedies of my Lord L. [?]; where the First Act should be _Potages_, the Second, _Fricasses &c._, and the Fifth, a _chere entiere_ of women. I rather guess, he means that betwixt one Comedy or Tragedy and another; there is no other difference but what is made by the liking or disliking of the audience. This is, indeed, a less error than the former; but yet it is a great one. The liking or disliking of the people gives the Play the _denomination_ of "good" or "bad"; but does not really make or constitute it such. To please the people ought to be the Poet's aim [pp. 513, 582, 584]; because Plays are made for their delight: but it does not follow, that they are always pleased with good plays; or that the plays which please them, are always good. The Humour of the people is now
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161  
162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Comedy
 

Tragedy

 

difference

 

people

 

disliking

 
determination
 
liking
 

betwixt

 
understand
 

scarce


spurious

 

fathered

 
imagine
 

concerned

 
honour
 

affirm

 
absurd
 
Reason
 

Comedies

 

constitute


denomination

 

follow

 

pleased

 

Humour

 

delight

 

Fricasses

 

Second

 

Potages

 

entiere

 

audience


excelled

 
Poetry
 

reason

 

Critic

 

evident

 
proceeded
 

phrase

 
obscurity
 

quarrel

 
exactness

Judgement
 

SANCHO

 
Doctor
 
understanding
 

unnecessary

 

prescribe

 
manner
 

composure

 
appetites
 

strictly