FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2308   2309   2310   2311   2312   2313   2314   2315   2316   2317   2318   2319   2320   2321   2322   2323   2324   2325   2326   2327   2328   2329   2330   2331   2332  
2333   2334   2335   2336   2337   2338   2339   2340   2341   2342   2343   2344   2345   2346   2347   2348   2349   2350   2351   2352   2353   2354   2355   2356   2357   >>   >|  
he blacks. The prejudices of the community render that hostility generally effective without the aid of legal enactments. Indeed, some remaining regard to decency and the opinion of the world, has restrained the Legislatures of the free States, with _one exception_, from consigning these unhappy people to ignorance by "decreeing unrighteous decrees," and "framing mischief by a law." Our readers, no doubt, feel that the exception must of course be OHIO. We have seen with what deference Ohio legislators profess to regard their _constitutional_ obligations; and we are now to contemplate another instance of their shameless violation of them. The Constitution which these men have sworn to obey declares, "NO LAW SHALL BE PASSED to prevent the poor of the several townships and counties in this State from an _equal_ participation in the schools, academies, colleges, and universities in this State, which are endowed in whole, or _in part_, from the revenue arising from _donations_ made by the United States, for the support of _colleges and schools_--and the door of said schools, academies, and universities shall be open for the reception of scholars, students, and teachers of every _grade_, without ANY DISTINCTION OR PREFERENCE WHATEVER." Can language be more explicit or unequivocal? But have any donations been made by the United States for the support of colleges and schools in Ohio? Yes--by an act of Congress, the sixteenth section of land in _each_ originally surveyed township in the State, was set apart as a donation for the express purpose of endowing and supporting common schools. And now, how have the scrupulous legislators of Ohio, who refuse to acknowledge any other than constitutional obligations to give ear to the cry of distress--how have they obeyed this injunction of the Constitution respecting the freedom of their schools? They enacted a law in 1831, declaring that, "when any appropriation shall be made by the directors of any school district, from the treasury thereof, for the payment of a teacher, the school in such district shall be open"--to whom? "_to scholars, students, and teachers of every grade, without distinction or preference whatever_," as commanded by the Constitution? Oh no! "Shall be open to all the WHITE children residing therein!!" Such is the impotency of written constitutions, where a sense of moral obligation is wanting to enforce them. We have now taken a review of the Ohio laws agains
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2308   2309   2310   2311   2312   2313   2314   2315   2316   2317   2318   2319   2320   2321   2322   2323   2324   2325   2326   2327   2328   2329   2330   2331   2332  
2333   2334   2335   2336   2337   2338   2339   2340   2341   2342   2343   2344   2345   2346   2347   2348   2349   2350   2351   2352   2353   2354   2355   2356   2357   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

schools

 

colleges

 
States
 

Constitution

 

academies

 

obligations

 

school

 

legislators

 

constitutional

 

universities


students

 

teachers

 

scholars

 

donations

 

United

 

support

 
exception
 

regard

 

district

 

township


enforce

 

preference

 

wanting

 

express

 
distinction
 

obligation

 

commanded

 
donation
 

surveyed

 
Congress

sixteenth
 
section
 

agains

 

children

 

originally

 

review

 

endowing

 
unequivocal
 
freedom
 

constitutions


thereof

 
payment
 
teacher
 

respecting

 

enacted

 

appropriation

 
directors
 

treasury

 

impotency

 

written