FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2298   2299   2300   2301   2302   2303   2304   2305   2306   2307   2308   2309   2310   2311   2312   2313   2314   2315   2316   2317   2318   2319   2320   2321   2322  
2323   2324   2325   2326   2327   2328   2329   2330   2331   2332   2333   2334   2335   2336   2337   2338   2339   2340   2341   2342   2343   2344   2345   2346   2347   >>   >|  
ns not actually slaves. That unjust and cruel enactments should proceed from a people who keep two millions of their fellow men in abject bondage, and who believe such enactments essential to the maintenance of their despotism, certainly affords no cause for surprise. We turn to the free States, where slavery has not directly steeled our hearts against human suffering, and where no supposed danger of insurrection affords a pretext for keeping the free blacks in ignorance and degradation; and we ask, what is the character of the prejudice against color _here_? Let the Rev. Mr. Bacon, of Connecticut, answer the question. This gentleman, in a vindication of the Colonization Society, assures us, "The _Soodra_ is not farther separated from the _Brahim_ in regard to all his privileges, civil, intellectual, and moral, than the negro from the white man by the prejudices which result from the difference made between them by THE GOD OF NATURE."--(_Rep. Am. Col. Soc._ p. 87.) We may here notice the very opposite effect produced on Abolitionists and Colonizationists, by the consideration that this difference _is_ made by the GOD OF NATURE; leading the one to discard the prejudice, and the other to banish its victims. With these preliminary remarks we will now proceed to take a view of the condition of the free people of color in the non-slaveholding States; and will consider in order, the various disabilities and oppressions to which they are subjected, either by law or the customs of society. 1. GENERAL EXCLUSION FROM THE ELECTIVE FRANCHISE. Were this exclusion founded on the want of property, or any other qualification deemed essential to the judicious exercise of the franchise, it would afford no just cause of complaint; but it is founded solely on the color of the skin, and is therefore irrational and unjust. That taxation and representation should be inseparable, was one of the axioms of the fathers of our revolution; and one of the reasons they assigned for their revolt from the crown of Britain. But _now_, it is deemed a mark of fanaticism to complain of the disfranchisement of a whole race, while they remain subject to the burden of taxation. It is worthy of remark, that of the thirteen original States, only _two_ were so recreant to the principles of the Revolution, as to make a _white skin_ a qualification for suffrage. But the prejudice has grown with our growth, and strengthened with our strength; and it
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   2298   2299   2300   2301   2302   2303   2304   2305   2306   2307   2308   2309   2310   2311   2312   2313   2314   2315   2316   2317   2318   2319   2320   2321   2322  
2323   2324   2325   2326   2327   2328   2329   2330   2331   2332   2333   2334   2335   2336   2337   2338   2339   2340   2341   2342   2343   2344   2345   2346   2347   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

prejudice

 

States

 
deemed
 

taxation

 

difference

 

NATURE

 

founded

 

qualification

 

enactments

 

affords


unjust

 

people

 

proceed

 

essential

 

GENERAL

 

EXCLUSION

 
suffrage
 

Revolution

 

exclusion

 

principles


recreant

 

ELECTIVE

 

FRANCHISE

 

subjected

 
growth
 

slaveholding

 

condition

 
strength
 

strengthened

 
customs

disabilities
 
oppressions
 

society

 

revolt

 

Britain

 

remark

 

thirteen

 
assigned
 
revolution
 

reasons


remarks

 
fanaticism
 
remain
 

subject

 

worthy

 

burden

 
complain
 

disfranchisement

 

fathers

 

axioms