FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1924   1925   1926   1927   1928   1929   1930   1931   1932   1933   1934   1935   1936   1937   1938   1939   1940   1941   1942   1943   1944   1945   1946   1947   1948  
1949   1950   1951   1952   1953   1954   1955   1956   1957   1958   1959   1960   1961   1962   1963   1964   1965   1966   1967   1968   1969   1970   1971   1972   1973   >>   >|  
o have had virtue and resolution enough to excite the opposition, and may imprison them during its pleasure in the remotest part of the Union; so that a citizen of Georgia might be _bastiled_ in the furthest part of New Hampshire; or a citizen of New Hampshire in the furthest extreme of the South, cut off from their family, their friends, and their every connexion. These considerations induced me, sir, to give my negative also to this clause. * * * * * EXTRACTS FROM DEBATES IN THE SEVERAL STATE CONVENTIONS ON THE ADOPTION OF THE UNITED STATES' CONSTITUTION. * * * * * MASSACHUSETTS CONVENTION. The third paragraph of the 2d section being read, Mr. King rose to explain it. There has, says he, been much misconception of this section. It is a principle of this Constitution, that representation and taxation should go hand in hand. This paragraph states, that the numbers of free persons shall be determined, by adding to the whole number of free persons, including those bound to service for a term of years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three-fifths of all other persons. These persons are the slaves. By this rule is representation and taxation to be apportioned. And it was adopted, because it was the language of all America. Mr. Widgery asked, if a boy of six years of age was to be considered as a free person? Mr. King in answer said, all persons born free were to be considered as freemen; and to make the idea of _taxation by numbers_ more intelligible, said that five negro children of South Carolina, are to pay as much tax as the three Governors of New Hampshire, Massachusetts, and Connecticut. Mr. Gorham thought the proposed section much in favor of Massachusetts; and if it operated against any state, it was Pennsylvania, because they have more white persons _bound_ than any other. Judge Dana, in reply to the remark of some gentlemen, that the southern States were favored in this mode of apportionment, by having five of their negroes set against three persons in the eastern, the honorable judge observed, that the negroes of the southern States work no longer than when the eye of the driver is on them. Can, asked he, that land flourish like this, which is cultivated by the hands of freemen? Are not _three_ of these independent freemen of more real advantage to a State, than _five_ of those poor slaves? Mr. Nasson remarked on the statement of the hon
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1924   1925   1926   1927   1928   1929   1930   1931   1932   1933   1934   1935   1936   1937   1938   1939   1940   1941   1942   1943   1944   1945   1946   1947   1948  
1949   1950   1951   1952   1953   1954   1955   1956   1957   1958   1959   1960   1961   1962   1963   1964   1965   1966   1967   1968   1969   1970   1971   1972   1973   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

persons

 

Hampshire

 
taxation
 

freemen

 

section

 

representation

 

numbers

 

Massachusetts

 

paragraph

 

considered


slaves

 

southern

 

negroes

 

States

 

citizen

 

furthest

 
Nasson
 

observed

 

answer

 

remarked


language

 

advantage

 

honorable

 

person

 
adopted
 

statement

 

Widgery

 
driver
 

America

 
longer

eastern
 
flourish
 

intelligible

 

Pennsylvania

 

favored

 

proposed

 

operated

 
remark
 
gentlemen
 

apportionment


thought

 
children
 
Carolina
 

independent

 

Connecticut

 

Gorham

 
cultivated
 

Governors

 

adding

 

considerations