FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1246   1247   1248   1249   1250   1251   1252   1253   1254   1255   1256   1257   1258   1259   1260   1261   1262   1263   1264   1265   1266   1267   1268   1269   1270  
1271   1272   1273   1274   1275   1276   1277   1278   1279   1280   1281   1282   1283   1284   1285   1286   1287   1288   1289   1290   1291   1292   1293   1294   1295   >>   >|  
e slave-_selling_ and the slave-_buying_ districts. Maryland, Virginia, Kentucky, Missouri and East Tennessee constitute the first. West Tennessee is somewhat equivocal. All the states south of Tennessee belong to the slave-_buying_ district. The first, with but few exceptions, have from the earliest times, felt slavery a reproach to their good name--an encumbrance on their advancement--at some period, to be cast off. This sentiment, had it been at all encouraged by the action of the General Government, in accordance with the views of the convention that formed the Constitution, would, in all probability, by this time, have brought slavery in Maryland and Virginia to an end. Notwithstanding the easy admission of slave states into the Union, and the _yielding_ of the free states whenever they were brought in collision with the South, have had a strong tendency to persuade the _farming_ slave states to continue their system, yet the sentiment in favor of emancipation in some form, still exists among them. Proof, encouraging proof of this, is found in the present attitude of Kentucky. Her legislature has just passed a law, proposing to the people, to hold a convention to alter the constitution. In the discussion of the bill, slavery as connected with some form of emancipation, seems to have constituted the most important element. The public journals too, that are _opposed_ to touching the subject at all, declare that the main object for recommending a convention was, to act on slavery in some way. Now, it would be in vain for the _planting_ South to expect, that Kentucky or any other of the _farming_ slave states would unite with her, in making slavery the _perpetual bond_ of a new political organization. If they feel the inconveniences of slavery _in their present condition_, they could not be expected to enter on another, where these inconveniences would be inconceivably multiplied and aggravated, and, by the very terms of their new contract, _perpetuated_. This letter is already so protracted, that I cannot stop here to develop more at large this part of the subject. To one acquainted with the state of public sentiment, in what I have called, the _farming_ district, it needs no further development. There is not one of these states embraced in it, that would not, when brought to the test, prefer the privileges of the Union to the privilege of perpetual slaveholding. And if there should turn out to be a single _deserti
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   1246   1247   1248   1249   1250   1251   1252   1253   1254   1255   1256   1257   1258   1259   1260   1261   1262   1263   1264   1265   1266   1267   1268   1269   1270  
1271   1272   1273   1274   1275   1276   1277   1278   1279   1280   1281   1282   1283   1284   1285   1286   1287   1288   1289   1290   1291   1292   1293   1294   1295   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

states

 

slavery

 
sentiment
 

brought

 

convention

 

Tennessee

 

farming

 
Kentucky
 

inconveniences

 

perpetual


emancipation

 

public

 

subject

 

present

 
district
 

Maryland

 

buying

 

Virginia

 

organization

 

condition


political

 

districts

 
inconceivably
 
multiplied
 
aggravated
 

Missouri

 
expected
 

recommending

 
object
 
touching

constitute
 

declare

 
planting
 
expect
 

making

 

perpetuated

 
prefer
 
privileges
 

embraced

 
development

privilege

 

slaveholding

 

single

 

deserti

 

called

 

protracted

 
selling
 

contract

 
opposed
 

letter