FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46  
47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   >>   >|  
ge has the family over the school and larger groups for educational purposes? 4. In what sense is the family an ideal democracy? 5. Show how the family sets spiritual values first. 6. What in your judgment are the first evidences of character development? In what way do these come to the surface in the family? What is the factor of love in the development of character? 7. Is that an ideal family in which none of the members bear pain or are called upon for self-denial? Can you see any especial advantage to character in the very difficulties and apparent disadvantages in the life of the family? FOOTNOTES: [5] See "Democracy in the Home," _American Journal of Sociology_, January, 1912. [6] Francis G. Peabody, _The Approach to the Social Question_, p. 94. CHAPTER IV THE RELIGIOUS PLACE OF THE FAMILY Sec. 1. DEVELOPMENT AS A RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION The family is the most important religious institution in the life of today. It ranks in influence before the church. It has always held this place. Even among primitive peoples, where family life was an uncertain quantity, the relations of parents, or of one of the parents, to the children afforded the opportunity most frequently used for their instruction in tribal religious ideals and customs. We cannot generalize as to the practices of savage man in regard to family life, for those practices range from common promiscuous relationships, without apparent care for offspring, to a family unity and purity approaching the best we know; but this much is certain, that there was a common sense of responsibility for the training of young children in moral and religious ideas and customs, and that, in the degree that the family approached to separateness and unity, it accepted the primary responsibility for this task. The higher the type of family life the more fully does it discharge its function in the education of the child.[7] It might be safe to say that among primitive peoples there were three stages, or types, of relationship based on the breeding of children, or three stages of development toward family life. The first is a loose and indefinite relationship existing principally between the adults, or the males and females, under which children born when not desired are neglected or strangled and, when acceptable, may be in the care of either parent, or of neither. Since the group, associated throug
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46  
47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

family

 
children
 

religious

 

development

 

character

 

RELIGIOUS

 
apparent
 

stages

 

relationship

 
common

primitive

 
parents
 

customs

 

practices

 
responsibility
 
peoples
 
training
 

generalize

 

savage

 
tribal

ideals

 

regard

 

offspring

 

purity

 

relationships

 

promiscuous

 

approaching

 
education
 

females

 

adults


indefinite
 
existing
 
principally
 

desired

 

neglected

 
throug
 
parent
 

strangled

 

acceptable

 

breeding


higher

 
approached
 

separateness

 

accepted

 

primary

 

discharge

 

function

 
instruction
 

degree

 
church