FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310  
311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   >>   >|  
the 18th of September. Could McClellan have known the desperate condition of most of Lee's brigades, he would also have known that his own were in much better case, badly as they had suffered. I do not doubt that most of his subordinates discouraged the resumption of the attack, for the belief in Lee's great preponderance in numbers had been chronic in the army during the whole year. That belief was based upon the inconceivably mistaken reports of the secret-service organization, accepted at headquarters, given to the War Department at Washington as a reason for incessant demands of reinforcements, and permeating downward through the whole organization till the error was accepted as truth by officers and men, and became a factor in their morale which can hardly be overestimated. The result was that Lee retreated unmolested on the night of the 18th of September, and that what might have been a real and decisive success was a drawn battle in which our chief claim to victory was the possession of the field. The numbers engaged and the losses on each side have been the subject of unending dispute. If we take the returns of Lee at the beginning of his campaign against Pope, and deduct his acknowledged losses, he crossed the Potomac with over 72,000 men. [Footnote: See my review of Henderson's Stonewall Jackson, "The Nation," Nov. 24, 1898, p.396.] If we take his returns of September 22, and add the acknowledged losses of the month, he had over 57,000. [Footnote: See my review of Allan's Army of Northern Virginia, "The Nation," Feb. 2, 1893, p.86. Also reply to General Fitzhugh Lee, _Id_., Dec. 20, 1894, p.462; Confederate Statistics, _Id_., Jan. 24, 1895, p.71; Review of Ropes's Story of the Civil War, _Id_., March 9, 1899, p.185.] McClellan's 87,000 present for duty is accepted by all, though various causes considerably reduced the number he brought into action. The best collation of reports of casualties at Antietam gives 12,410 as those on the National side, and 11,172 on the Confederate. [Footnote: Century War Book, vol. ii. p.603.] Longstreet, comparing the fighting in the fiercest battles of the war, says "on no single day in any one of them was there such carnage as in this fierce struggle." [Footnote: From Manassas to Appomattox, p.239.] CHAPTER XVII MCCLELLAN AND POLITICS--HIS REMOVAL AND ITS CAUSE Meeting Colonel Key--His changes of opinion--His relations to McClellan--Governor Dennison's influenc
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310  
311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

losses

 
accepted
 

McClellan

 

September

 

acknowledged

 

numbers

 

returns

 

organization

 

Confederate


reports

 
Nation
 
review
 

belief

 
number
 
brought
 

present

 

reduced

 

considerably

 

General


Fitzhugh

 

Northern

 

Virginia

 

Review

 

Statistics

 

Appomattox

 

Manassas

 

CHAPTER

 

MCCLELLAN

 
struggle

carnage

 

fierce

 
POLITICS
 

relations

 

opinion

 
Governor
 

Dennison

 
influenc
 

REMOVAL

 
Meeting

Colonel

 

National

 

Century

 
collation
 

casualties

 

Antietam

 
single
 

battles

 

Longstreet

 
comparing