FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300  
301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   >>   >|  
d form. As will shortly be seen, I take a different view of its origin.] [Footnote 31: _Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania_, iii., p. 280-81.] [Footnote 32: I have since found, however, that the name Dawn, which occurs in various places, seems more frequently a birth-name, given because the birth took place at dawn.] MORALS AND MORAL SENTIMENTS. [_First published in_ The Fortnightly Review _for April,_ 1871.] If a writer who discusses unsettled questions takes up every gauntlet thrown down to him, polemical writing will absorb much of his energy. Having a power of work which unfortunately does not suffice for executing with anything like due rapidity the task I have undertaken, I have made it a policy to avoid controversy as much as possible, even at the cost of being seriously misunderstood. Hence it resulted that when in _Macmillan's Magazine_, for July, 1869, Mr. Richard Hutton published, under the title "A Questionable Parentage for Morals," a criticism on a doctrine of mine, I decided to let his misrepresentations pass unnoticed until, in the course of my work, I arrived at the stage where, by a full exposition of this doctrine, they would be set aside. It did not occur to me that, in the meantime, these erroneous statements, accepted as true statements, would be repeated by other writers, and my views commented upon as untenable. This, however, has happened. In more periodicals than one, I have seen it asserted that Mr. Hutton has effectually disposed of my hypothesis. Supposing that this hypothesis has been rightly expressed by Mr. Hutton, Sir John Lubbock, in his _Origin of Civilisation_, &c., has been led to express a partial dissent; which I think he would not have expressed had my own exposition been before him. Mr. Mivart, too, in his recent _Genesis of Species_, has been similarly betrayed into misapprehensions. And now Sir Alexander Grant, following the same lead, has conveyed to the readers of the _Fortnightly Review_ another of these conceptions, which is but very partially true. Thus I find myself compelled to say as much as will serve to prevent further spread of the mischief. * * * * * If a general doctrine concerning a highly-involved class of phenomena could be adequately presented in a single paragraph of a letter, the writing of books would be superfluous. In the brief exposition of certain ethical doctrines held by me, which is g
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300  
301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Hutton

 

doctrine

 

exposition

 

Footnote

 
published
 

Fortnightly

 

hypothesis

 

writing

 
Review
 

expressed


statements
 
Origin
 

Lubbock

 

accepted

 

erroneous

 

Civilisation

 

dissent

 

partial

 

express

 

meantime


periodicals
 

commented

 

happened

 

untenable

 

asserted

 

Supposing

 
repeated
 
writers
 

disposed

 
effectually

rightly

 

similarly

 
general
 

highly

 

involved

 
phenomena
 
mischief
 

spread

 

compelled

 

prevent


adequately

 

ethical

 

doctrines

 
superfluous
 

single

 
presented
 

paragraph

 

letter

 

betrayed

 
Species