FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426  
427   428   >>  
this agreement was a note (September 1, 1915) from Count von Bernstorff to Secretary Lansing announcing that his instructions concerning Germany's answer to the last American note on the _Lusitania_ contained this passage: "Liners will not be sunk by our submarines without warning and without safety of the lives of noncombatants, provided the liners do not try to escape or offer resistance." The German Ambassador added that this policy had been decided on before the _Arabic_ was sunk. Secretary Lansing, commenting upon this abatement of Germany's sea war methods, said: "It appears to be a recognition of the fundamental principles for which we have contended." A settlement of the _Lusitania_ case, however, was deferred until that of the _Arabic_ had been satisfactorily disposed of. The atmosphere was clearer. But Germany was still silent regarding the report of the submarine commander, on whose version of the _Arabic's_ destruction hinged the question whether Germany would disavow his act. The report that the submarine had been sunk revived in London, but the British admiralty maintained an impenetrable silence regarding its truth or falsehood. The circumstantial story was that the submarine later sighted a cattle boat, and was engaged in shelling it when a British patrol boat appeared and, opening fire, sank the submarine with its crew except two or three survivors. Hence London concluded that in the disappearance of the submarine lay Germany's reason for her readiness to climb down to the United States on the _Arabic_ controversy. On September 7, 1915, nineteen days after the _Arabic_ was sunk, Germany appeared to disprove this story of furnishing a report to the American Government giving the submarine commander's account of the sinking. This delay was in contrast to the promptitude with which the German Government had officially announced the sinking of the _Lusitania_. The British openly charged that Germany could not have heard from the submarine commander, for the sufficient reason, they iterated, that he was drowned with his craft, and that the German Government, waiting in vain for him to report, had resorted to "manufacturing" a report to conform with its preconceived theories of the _Arabic's_ destruction. This, however, remained an unsolved press controversy in face of the British admiralty's silence. The American Government gave no indication that it took cognizance of the charge, or that the Briti
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   402   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426  
427   428   >>  



Top keywords:

submarine

 

Germany

 

Arabic

 
report
 

Government

 
British
 

German

 
Lusitania
 

commander

 
American

reason

 
appeared
 
London
 
destruction
 

Lansing

 
Secretary
 

sinking

 

September

 

silence

 
admiralty

controversy

 

survivors

 
concluded
 

readiness

 

disappearance

 

patrol

 

shelling

 

cattle

 

engaged

 

opening


United

 

charge

 

cognizance

 
drowned
 

iterated

 

sufficient

 
waiting
 

conform

 
preconceived
 

theories


unsolved

 
manufacturing
 

resorted

 
charged
 

disprove

 

furnishing

 
indication
 

nineteen

 

remained

 

giving