FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   >>  
oblems and their weight in the religious realm which so fully harmonize with the views of this first authority in the realm of the history of development. I shall still have occasion here and there to avail myself of a study of this latest and most important publication upon the question of Darwinism, and shall confine myself here to the remark that von Baer, although he rejects the selection theory and the superficial treatment of the principle of evolution on the part of materialists, is by no means disinclined to the idea of the origin of species through descent, whether in gradual development or in leaps; and that in this respect he could no longer be counted among the advocates of the group above referred to, but among those which we mention farther on, had he not repeatedly and forcibly confessed, with a modesty worthy of acknowledgment, his total ignorance concerning the manner in which certain forms of life, especially the higher ones, originated. The origin of higher species without the supposition of a descent is to him unexplainable, because the individuals of these species are, in their first development of life, so dependent on the mother. Furthermore, he points out the fact that in early periods of the earth the organic forming power which ruled, must have been a higher one than it is at the present time; in like manner as the first period in the embryonic development of individuals is to-day the most productive. This higher power of organization, he says, could consist in a higher power of changing organisms into new species, as well as in a higher power of producing new species through primitive generation; or it could consist in both. In general, there is no reason to suppose that primitive generations which took place at the first origination of life on earth, could not have been repeated later and oftener. The nearer a generation was to these individuals originated through primitive generation, the greater was undoubtedly its flexibility and changeableness; the farther, the greater the fixity of type. [4] After the completion this manuscript, the author found that K. E. von Baer, in his treatise upon Darwin's doctrine, pays especial attention to the change of generation and also to the metamorphosis of plants and animals in exactly the same sense and reaches the same conclusion. [5] Compare Max Mueller, "Lectures on the Science of Language," 6th ed., London, 1871, vol. I, p. 403. [6] Compare v. Ba
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   >>  



Top keywords:

higher

 

species

 
generation
 

development

 
primitive
 

individuals

 

farther

 
greater
 

origin

 

consist


manner

 

originated

 

descent

 
Compare
 

London

 

reason

 
suppose
 

producing

 

general

 

generations


period
 

embryonic

 
productive
 
origination
 

organisms

 
changing
 

organization

 

nearer

 

Darwin

 

doctrine


conclusion

 

present

 

treatise

 
reaches
 

plants

 

animals

 

metamorphosis

 

especial

 

attention

 

change


Lectures

 

undoubtedly

 
Science
 

Language

 

oftener

 

flexibility

 

changeableness

 

manuscript

 

author

 
Mueller