t is, literally, an "after consideration."
Who and what man is, here and now, is the real problem. Only when, or in
the degree in which, we master this problem, can we really know anything
definitely of the other.
The complete separation of these two problems, and the exact definition
and formulation of each, is the first step on the road to knowledge of the
Science of the Soul.
For the time being, in the study of Psychology, "other worldliness" should
be absolutely abandoned.
Almost everyone finds it difficult to do this. Many find it impossible.
The fear and uncertainty with which almost everyone faces the inevitable,
the loss of friends, the broken lute, the empty chair, the lonely
life--all these make us cry out in anguish--_where_ and _how_ and _when_,
and overlook the "_what are we_?"
So-called Religion in all time has almost hopelessly mixed and confused
these problems.
The various concepts and doctrines of rewards and punishments hereafter,
have put ulterior motives in the place of actual values, weakened the will
and hindered man from doing his best.
A still further confusion follows, in the measure of assets, that leads to
time-serving and false values.
Satisfy the average individual that "death ends all" and he will cry, "Let
us eat, drink, and be merry, for to-morrow we die," notwithstanding the
fact that he sees others who have "gone the pace," realized only "dust and
ashes," declared it "all a mistake," and that if they had the chance they
would "do it all the other way."
Remember, we are dealing with _actual values_ here and now, divested of
both fear and anticipation of the hereafter.
On the other hand, who ever saw an individual die, who had led a clean,
upright, kindly life, indulge in regret or remorse, or declare life a
disappointment or a failure?
The first is anchored to the physical plane by insatiate appetite and
passion, or desire to reform, which might soon be forgotten.
The other has found sweetness and joy in life, in conscious growth, in
doing good; and his soul is illumined and transfigured as the body fails
and he approaches another plane, and this often independent of any
formulated religious belief.
It all depends on what the man is _within_ himself, his intrinsic
character, his _real self_; and no matter where he goes, that character,
that self, goes with him. It _is_ Himself.
The "change in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye," is not in the _man_
and
|