FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685  
686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   >>   >|  
s in the name of the Trinity, by which baptism is consecrated: for such a sense would be contrary to faith, and would therefore render the sacrament invalid: whereas if the addition, "and in the name of the Blessed Virgin" be understood, not as if the name of the Blessed Virgin effected anything in baptism, but as intimating that her intercession may help the person baptized to preserve the baptismal grace, then the sacrament is not rendered void. Reply Obj. 1: It is not lawful to add anything to the words of Holy Scripture as regards the sense; but many words are added by Doctors by way of explanation of the Holy Scriptures. Nevertheless, it is not lawful to add even words to Holy Scripture as though such words were a part thereof, for this would amount to forgery. It would amount to the same if anyone were to pretend that something is essential to a sacramental form, which is not so. Reply Obj. 2: Words belong to a sacramental form by reason of the sense signified by them. Consequently any addition or suppression of words which does not add to or take from the essential sense, does not destroy the essence of the sacrament. Reply Obj. 3: If the words are interrupted to such an extent that the intention of the speaker is interrupted, the sacramental sense is destroyed, and consequently, the validity of the sacrament. But this is not the case if the interruption of the speaker is so slight, that his intention and the sense of the words is not interrupted. The same is to be said of a change in the order of the words. Because if this destroys the sense of the words, the sacrament is invalidated: as happens when a negation is made to precede or follow a word. But if the order is so changed that the sense of the words does not vary, the sacrament is not invalidated, according to the Philosopher's dictum: "Nouns and verbs mean the same though they be transposed" (Peri Herm. x). _______________________ QUESTION 61 OF THE NECESSITY OF THE SACRAMENTS (In Four Articles) We must now consider the necessity of the sacraments; concerning which there are four points of inquiry: (1) Whether sacraments are necessary for man's salvation? (2) Whether they were necessary in the state that preceded sin? (3) Whether they were necessary in the state after sin and before Christ? (4) Whether they were necessary after Christ's coming? _______________________ FIRST ARTICLE [III, Q. 61, Art. 1] Whether Sacraments A
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685  
686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
sacrament
 

Whether

 

interrupted

 

sacramental

 

essential

 

sacraments

 
invalidated
 

speaker

 

intention

 

baptism


Scripture
 

amount

 

Blessed

 
Virgin
 
Christ
 
addition
 

lawful

 
salvation
 

dictum

 

Philosopher


destroys

 

Because

 

negation

 

Sacraments

 

follow

 
preceded
 

precede

 
changed
 

Articles

 

coming


change

 

ARTICLE

 

necessity

 

SACRAMENTS

 
inquiry
 

points

 
NECESSITY
 

QUESTION

 

transposed

 

signified


rendered

 

baptismal

 

baptized

 
preserve
 

explanation

 
Scriptures
 
Doctors
 

person

 
render
 
contrary