FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688  
689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   >>   >|  
necessary to man before sin. _On the contrary,_ None but the sick need remedies, according to Matt. 9:12: "They that are in health need not a physician." Now the sacraments are spiritual remedies for the healing of wounds inflicted by sin. Therefore they were not necessary before sin. _I answer that,_ Sacraments were not necessary in the state of innocence. This can be proved from the rectitude of that state, in which the higher (parts of man) ruled the lower, and nowise depended on them: for just as the mind was subject to God, so were the lower powers of the soul subject to the mind, and the body to the soul. And it would be contrary to this order if the soul were perfected either in knowledge or in grace, by anything corporeal; which happens in the sacraments. Therefore in the state of innocence man needed no sacraments, whether as remedies against sin or as means of perfecting the soul. Reply Obj. 1: In the state of innocence man needed grace: not so that he needed to obtain grace by means of sensible signs, but in a spiritual and invisible manner. Reply Obj. 2: Man's nature is the same before and after sin, but the state of his nature is not the same. Because after sin, the soul, even in its higher part, needs to receive something from corporeal things in order that it may be perfected: whereas man had no need of this in that state. Reply Obj. 3: Matrimony was instituted in the state of innocence, not as a sacrament, but as a function of nature. Consequently, however, it foreshadowed something in relation to Christ and the Church: just as everything else foreshadowed Christ. _______________________ THIRD ARTICLE [III, Q. 61, Art. 3] Whether There Should Have Been Sacraments After Sin, Before Christ? Objection 1: It seems that there should have been no sacraments after sin, before Christ. For it has been stated that the Passion of Christ is applied to men through the sacraments: so that Christ's Passion is compared to the sacraments as cause to effect. But effect does not precede cause. Therefore there should have been no sacraments before Christ's coming. Obj. 2: Further, sacraments should be suitable to the state of the human race, as Augustine declares (Contra Faust. xix). But the state of the human race underwent no change after sin until it was repaired by Christ. Neither, therefore, should the sacraments have been changed, so that besides the sacraments of the natural law, others should
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   678   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688  
689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703   704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
sacraments
 

Christ

 

innocence

 

needed

 

nature

 

Therefore

 
remedies
 

subject

 

effect

 

corporeal


perfected
 

Passion

 

contrary

 
Sacraments
 
spiritual
 
foreshadowed
 

higher

 
relation
 

Whether

 

Church


Before

 

Objection

 

Should

 

natural

 

ARTICLE

 
suitable
 

Further

 
coming
 

precede

 

Augustine


change

 

Contra

 

declares

 

repaired

 
compared
 

underwent

 
stated
 

changed

 

applied

 

Consequently


Neither

 

rectitude

 

proved

 
answer
 

nowise

 
powers
 
depended
 

wounds

 
inflicted
 
healing