FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703  
704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   >>   >|  
es up to the Divine worship according to the rite of the Old Law, which was wholly ordained to the foreshadowing of Christ's Passion. Reply Obj. 3: There have been many opinions about Circumcision. For, according to some, Circumcision conferred no grace, but only remitted sin. But this is impossible; because man is not justified from sin save by grace, according to Rom. 3:24: "Being justified freely by His grace." Wherefore others said that by Circumcision grace is conferred, as to the privative effects of sin, but not as to its positive effects. But this also appears to be false, because by Circumcision, children received the faculty of obtaining glory, which is the ultimate positive effect of grace. Moreover, as regards the order of the formal cause, positive effects are naturally prior to privative effects, though according to the order of the material cause, the reverse is the case: for a form does not exclude privation save by informing the subject. Hence others say that Circumcision conferred grace also as regards a certain positive effect, i.e. by making man worthy of eternal life, but not so as to repress concupiscence which makes man prone to sin. And so at one time it seemed to me. But if the matter be considered carefully, this too appears to be untrue; because the very least grace is sufficient to resist any degree of concupiscence, and to merit eternal life. And therefore it seems better to say that Circumcision was a sign of justifying faith: wherefore the Apostle says (Rom. 4:11) that Abraham "received the sign of Circumcision, a seal of the justice of faith." Consequently grace was conferred in Circumcision in so far as it was a sign of Christ's future Passion, as will be made clear further on (Q. 70, A. 4). _______________________ QUESTION 63 OF THE OTHER EFFECT OF THE SACRAMENTS, WHICH IS A CHARACTER (In Six Articles) We have now to consider the other effect of the sacraments, which is a character: and concerning this there are six points of inquiry: (1) Whether by the sacraments a character is produced in the soul? (2) What is this character? (3) Of whom is this character? (4) What is its subject? (5) Is it indelible? (6) Whether every sacrament imprints a character? _______________________ FIRST ARTICLE [III, Q. 63, Art. 1] Whether a Sacrament Imprints a Character on the Soul? Objection 1: It seems that a sacrament does not imprint a character on the soul. For
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692   693   694   695   696   697   698   699   700   701   702   703  
704   705   706   707   708   709   710   711   712   713   714   715   716   717   718   719   720   721   722   723   724   725   726   727   728   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Circumcision
 

character

 

conferred

 

effects

 

positive

 

effect

 
Whether
 

sacrament

 

received

 

appears


sacraments
 

subject

 

concupiscence

 
eternal
 
justified
 
privative
 

Passion

 
Christ
 

EFFECT

 

SACRAMENTS


wholly

 

ordained

 

foreshadowing

 

Articles

 

CHARACTER

 
QUESTION
 

Consequently

 
justice
 

Abraham

 

future


Wherefore

 

ARTICLE

 

imprints

 

Sacrament

 
imprint
 

Objection

 
Imprints
 

Character

 

indelible

 

points


inquiry

 

worship

 

produced

 
Divine
 

informing

 
remitted
 
privation
 

exclude

 
impossible
 
worthy