hich there has been much discussion. The Alexandrine rendering of
this word, _Ecclesiastes_, _one who gathers or addresses an assembly_,
and the English rendering, _Preacher_, express for substance its
probable meaning; or rather, since the form of the word is feminine, it
is _Wisdom as a preacher_, Solomon being regarded as her impersonation.
The uniform belief of the ancient church was that Solomon wrote this
book in his old age, when brought to repentance for the idolatrous
practices into which his heathen wives had seduced him. He had
thoroughly tried the world in all its forms of honor, wealth, pleasure,
and the pursuit of wisdom--speculative wisdom--and found it only "vanity
and vexation of spirit," when sought as the supreme good. The conclusion
to which he comes is that in such an empty and unsatisfying world, where
disappointment and trouble cannot be avoided, the cheerful enjoyment of
God's present gifts is the part of wisdom, for thus we make the best of
things as we find them. But this enjoyment must be in the fear of God,
who will bring all our works into judgment; and accompanied, moreover,
by deeds of love and charity, as we have opportunity. He explicitly
asserts a judgment to come; yet his general view of life is that
expressed in the Saviour's words: "The night cometh, when no man can
work;" words which imply that God's earthly service, as well as the
enjoyment of his earthly gifts, will come to a close at death. This view
of the Preacher is not a denial of the future life, as some have wrongly
maintained, but implies rather a less full revelation of it than is
given in the New Testament.

Many evangelical men, as Hengstenberg, Keil, and others,
interpret the first verse of this book as meaning not that
Solomon was himself the author, or that the writer meant to pass
himself off as Solomon, but simply that he wrote in Solomon's
name, as assuming his character; that monarch being to the
ancient Hebrews the impersonation of wisdom. Their reasons for
this view are chiefly two: _First_, that the state of things
described in the book of Ecclesiastes does not suit Solomon's
age, the picture being too dark and sombre for his reign;
_secondly_, that the language differs widely from that of the
book of Proverbs and of the Canticles. Whether we adopt this
view, or that above given, the _canonical authority_ of the book
of Ecclesiastes remains as a well-establis