FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641  
642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   >>  
32; otherwise in vi. 37) Sabinus regularly takes precedence, as also from the narrative of the catastrophe itself. Besides we cannot possibly suppose that Caesar should have placed over a camp two officers with equal authority, and have made no arrangement at all for the case of a difference of opinion. the five cohorts are not counted as part of a legion (comp. vi. 32, 33) any more than the twelve cohorts at the Rhine bridge (vi. 29, comp. 32, 33), and appear to have consisted of detachments of other portions of the army, which had been assigned to reinforce this camp situated nearest to the Germans. 44. V. VII. Subjugation of the Belgae 45. IV. V. War with the Allobroges and Arverni 46. V. VII. Cantonal Constitution 47. This, it is true, was only possible, so long as offensive weapons chiefly aimed at cutting and stabbing. In the modern mode of warfare, as Napoleon has excellently explained, this system has become inapplicable, because with our offensive weapons operating from a distance the deployed position is more advantageous than the concentrated. In Caesar's time the reverse was the case. 48. This place has been sought on a rising ground which is still named Gergoie, a league to the south of the Arvernian capital Nemetum, the modern Clermont; and both the remains of rude fortress-walls brought to light in excavations there, and the tradition of the name which is traced in documents up to the tenth century, leave no room for doubt as to the correctness of this determination of the locality. Moreover it accords, as with the other statements of Caesar, so especially with the fact that he pretty clearly indicates Gergovia as the chief place of the Arverni (vii. 4). We shall have accordingly to assume, that the Arvernians after their defeat were compelled to transfer their settlement from Gergovia to the neighbouring less strong Nemetum. 49. The question so much discussed of late, whether Alesia is not rather to be identified with Alaise (25 kilometres to the south of Besancon, dep. Doubs), has been rightly answered in the negative by all judicious inquirers. 50. This is usually sought at Capdenac not far from Figeac; Goler has recently declared himself in favour of Luzech to the west of Cahors, a site which had been previously suggested. 51. This indeed, as may readily be conceived, is not recorded by Caesar himself, but an intelligible hint on this subject is given by Sallust (Hist.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   617   618   619   620   621   622   623   624   625   626   627   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641  
642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652   >>  



Top keywords:

Caesar

 

cohorts

 

modern

 

Nemetum

 

Gergovia

 

Arverni

 

offensive

 

sought

 

weapons

 

transfer


assume
 

Arvernians

 
compelled
 

defeat

 
statements
 

documents

 

century

 

traced

 

brought

 

excavations


tradition

 
correctness
 

pretty

 

locality

 

determination

 

Moreover

 

accords

 
identified
 

Cahors

 

previously


suggested
 

Luzech

 

favour

 

Figeac

 

recently

 

declared

 

subject

 
Sallust
 

intelligible

 

readily


conceived
 
recorded
 

Capdenac

 

discussed

 

Alesia

 

question

 

neighbouring

 

strong

 
Alaise
 

negative