orious digestion of a prime
minister.[19-+] See a very curious anecdote in the memoirs of COUNT
ZINZENDORFF in Dodsley's Annual Register for 1762. 3d edition, p. 32.
The philosopher Pythagoras seems to have been extremely nice in eating;
among his absolute injunctions to his disciples, he commands them to
"abstain from beans."
This ancient sage has been imitated by the learned who have discoursed
on this subject since, who are liberal of their negative, and niggardly
of their positive precepts--in the ratio, that it is easier to tell you
not to do this, than to teach you how to do that.
Our great English moralist Dr. S. JOHNSON, his biographer Boswell tells
us, "was a man of very nice discernment in the science of cookery," and
talked of good eating with uncommon satisfaction. "Some people," said
he, "have a foolish way of not minding, or pretending not to mind, what
they eat; for my part, I mind my belly very studiously and very
carefully, and I look upon it that he who does not mind his belly, will
hardly mind any thing else."
The Dr. might have said, _cannot_ mind any thing else. The energy of our
BRAINS is sadly dependent on the behaviour of our BOWELS.[20-*] Those
who say, 'Tis no matter what we eat or what we drink, may as well say,
'Tis no matter whether we eat, or whether we drink.
The following anecdotes I copy from Boswell's life of Johnson.
_Johnson._--"I could write a better book of cookery than has ever yet
been written; it should be a book on philosophical principles. I would
tell what is the best butcher's meat, the proper seasons of different
vegetables, and then, how to roast, and boil, and to compound."
_Dilly._--"_Mrs. Glasse's cookery_, which is the best, was written by
Dr. Hill."
_Johnson._--"Well, Sir--this shows how much better the subject of
cookery[20-+] may be treated by a philosopher;[20-++] but you shall see
what a book of cookery I shall make, and shall agree with Mr. Dilly for
the copyright."
_Miss Seward._--"That would be Hercules with the distaff indeed!"
_Johnson._--"No, madam; women can spin very well, but they cannot make a
good book of cookery." See vol. iii. p. 311.
Mr. B. adds, "I never knew a man who relished good eating more than he
did: when at table, he was totally absorbed in the business of the
moment: nor would he, unless in very high company, say one word, or even
pay the least attention to what was said by others, until he had
satisfied his appetite.
|