FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37  
38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   >>   >|  
irs of individuals. Every ethical religion teaches them in this area, and the person who rejects them is definitely the exception in our western society, until the violent man is regarded as subject to the discipline of society in general. Our real concern in this study is with non-violent means of achieving group purposes, whether they be defensive and conservative in character, or whether they be changes in the existing institutions of the social order. The study is not so much concerned with the religious and ethical bases of these techniques as it is with a consideration of their application in practice, and their effectiveness in achieving the purposes which the group in question has in view. We shall begin at one end of our scale and proceed to discuss each type of action in turn. FOOTNOTES: [8] Guy F. Hershberger makes a definite distinction between non-resistance and pacifism. He says that the former term describes the faith and life of those "Who cannot have any part in warfare because they believe the Bible forbids it, and who renounce all coercion, even nonviolent coercion." He goes on to say, "Pacifism, on the other hand, is a term which covers many types of opposition to war. Some modern so-called pacifists are opposed to all wars, and some are not. Some who oppose all wars find their authority in the will of God, while others find it largely in human reason. There are many other differences among them." "Biblical Nonresistance and Modern Pacifism," _The Mennonite Quarterly Review_, XVII, (July, 1943), 116. Hershberger is here defining pacifism broadly to include the European meaning of opposition to war, but not necessarily a refusal to take part in it. In the United States, and generally in Great Britain, the term is ordinarily applied only to those who actually refuse participation in war. [9] See Devere Allen, _The Fight for Peace_ (New York: Macmillan, 1930), 531-540. [10] On the origins of these terms see Haridas T. Muzumdar, _The United Nations of the World_ (New York: Universal, 1942), 201-203. [11] John Haynes Holmes, using the older term rather than "pacifist," has said, "The true non-resistant is militant--but he lifts his militancy from the plane of physical, to the plane of moral and spiritual force." _New Wars for Old_ (New York: Dodd, Mead, 1916), xiii. [12] Cecil John Cadoux, _Christian Pacifism Re-examined_ (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1940), 15-16; Leyton Richards, _Realisti
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37  
38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Pacifism

 

opposition

 

Hershberger

 

coercion

 
pacifism
 

United

 

achieving

 

violent

 

society

 

ethical


purposes

 

States

 

examined

 
physical
 
generally
 
Oxford
 

Blackwell

 

ordinarily

 

participation

 

Christian


refuse

 

refusal

 

applied

 
Britain
 

Realisti

 

Review

 
Nonresistance
 
Modern
 

Mennonite

 
Quarterly

defining
 

broadly

 
necessarily
 

spiritual

 
meaning
 

Richards

 

include

 
Leyton
 

European

 

Devere


Holmes

 
Haynes
 

Biblical

 

resistant

 
militant
 

pacifist

 

militancy

 

Universal

 
Macmillan
 

Cadoux