FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39  
40   41   42   43   44   >>  
for Waltheof being sent as envoy to William? and, if so, on what mission? 2. Is it not the more correct account, that the Conqueror gave his niece Judith in marriage to Waltheof _after_ the surrender of the city, [at the same time that he conferred other honours upon him, out of respect for his brave defence of the city; creating him, first, Earl of Northhampton and Huntingdon, and afterwards Earl of Northumberland, A.D. 1070.] And if so, as Waltheof could certainly not have had any "pledge of love" _before_ the siege of York; so neither is it probable that he had any issue at all by Judith, as in the same year, 1070, he was beheaded by William, for supposed participation in a conspiracy at York. The above drama is said to be "by a descendant of one of the _dramatis personae_," viz. of "De Combre, one of William's generals;" being written by Rev. Thomas Comber, of Oswaldkirk, Yorkshire. This De Combre is represented as having married _Ilda_, a daughter of King Harold, and sister of _Edgar_. Can any of your correspondents furnish me with information as to the origin and antiquity of this family of Comber? I learn from the present representatives of this family, that they have no recorded pedigree which goes higher than the reign of Henry VI., but that the family tradition has always been, that their ancestor came over from Normandy with William, and married Ilda, daughter of Harold. It seems that the name of Ilda is at this very day borne by one of the family. In the _Memoirs of Dr. Thomas Comber, Dean of Durham_, this De Combre is said to have had the manor of Barkham, in Sussex, given to him by the Conqueror. What family had King Harold II.? Had he any daughter Ilda? and, if so, is there any record or mention of her husband's name? T.E.L.L. 19th July, 1850. _"De male quaesitis," &c._--Spelman's striking argument, that spoliated church property is seldom enjoyed for more than three generations, seems but a special application of a general principle,-- "De male quaesitis gaudet non tertius haeraes." Can any of your readers tell me who is the author of the above verse? I find it quoted as "an adage" by John Gadsbury, in his work _On the Doctrine of Nativities_, 1658. R.P. _Westminster Abbey._--The late Sir Harry Englefield is known to have had access to some of the original fabric accounts of this venerable structure. Can any of your readers inform me whether he published the information he may have
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39  
40   41   42   43   44   >>  



Top keywords:

family

 

William

 
Harold
 

daughter

 

Combre

 
Comber
 

Waltheof

 

readers

 

quaesitis

 
married

information

 
Thomas
 

Conqueror

 

Judith

 

Spelman

 
church
 

property

 

seldom

 

spoliated

 

argument


striking
 

husband

 
Durham
 

Memoirs

 

Barkham

 

Sussex

 

record

 
mention
 

enjoyed

 

generations


Englefield
 
Westminster
 

access

 
inform
 

published

 

structure

 

venerable

 

original

 
fabric
 
accounts

Nativities

 

Doctrine

 

tertius

 

haeraes

 
gaudet
 

principle

 

mission

 

special

 
application
 

general