FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41  
42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   >>   >|  
e of Machiavelliism--The great blunder of Germany's diplomats and soldiers 196 CHAPTER X THE JUDGMENT OF THE WORLD The completeness of the evidence--The force of public opinion--The judgment of neutral States--The United States as a moral arbiter--A summary of the probable verdict of history 246 EPILOGUE 252 The Evidence in the Case CHAPTER I THE SUPREME COURT OF CIVILIZATION Let us suppose that in this year of dis-Grace, 1914, there had existed, as let us pray will one day exist, a Supreme Court of Civilization, before which the sovereign nations could litigate their differences without resort to the iniquitous arbitrament of arms and that each of the contending nations had a sufficient leaven of Christianity or shall we say commonplace, everyday morality, to have its grievances adjudged not by the ethics of the cannon, but by the eternal criterion of justice. _What would be the judgment of that august tribunal?_ It may be suggested that the question is academic, as no such Supreme Court exists or is likely to exist within the life of any living man. Casuists of the Bernhardi school of moral philosophy will further suggest that to discuss the ethical merits of the war is to start with a false premise that such a thing as international morality exists, and that when once the conventionalities of civilization are laid aside the leading nations commence and make war in a manner that differs only in degree and not in kind from the methods of Frederick the Great and Napoleon, and that these in turn only differed in degree from those of Alaric and Attila. According to this theory, the only law of nations is that ascribed by the poet to Rob Roy: "The good old rule Sufficeth them, the simple plan That they should take who have the power, And they should keep who can." Does the Twentieth Century only differ from its predecessors in having a thin veneering of hypocrisy, or has there developed in the progress of civilization an international morality, by which, even though imperfectly, the moral conduct of nations is judged? The answer can be an unqualified affirmative. With the age of the printing press, the steamship, the railroad, and the telegraph there has developed _a conscience of mankind_. Wh
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41  
42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
nations
 

morality

 

degree

 

civilization

 

States

 

CHAPTER

 
exists
 

international

 

developed

 
Supreme

judgment

 

differed

 

Frederick

 

methods

 
Napoleon
 

premise

 

merits

 
ethical
 

philosophy

 

suggest


discuss

 

leading

 
commence
 

manner

 

Alaric

 

conventionalities

 
differs
 

Sufficeth

 
imperfectly
 
conduct

judged

 

answer

 

progress

 

veneering

 

hypocrisy

 

unqualified

 

affirmative

 

telegraph

 

conscience

 
mankind

railroad
 

steamship

 

printing

 

predecessors

 
differ
 

According

 

theory

 
ascribed
 

school

 

Twentieth