FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27  
28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   >>   >|  
, Letter 46). In _The Fable of the Bees_, Mandeville concedes that gifts to charity would support employment as much as would equivalent expenditures on luxuries, but argues that in practice the gifts would not be made. Of the few contemporary notices of the _Letter to Dion_, the most important was by John, Lord Hervey. Hervey charged both Berkeley and Mandeville with unfairness, but aimed most of his criticism at Berkeley. He claimed that _Alciphron_ displayed the weaknesses of argument in dialogue form, that it tended either to state the opponent's case so strongly that it became difficult afterwards to refute it or so weakly that it was not worth answering. He found fault with Berkeley for denying that Mandeville had told a great many disagreeable truths--presumably about human nature and its mode of operation in society--and with Mandeville for having told them in public. He held, I believe rightly, that Mandeville, in associating vice with prosperity, deliberately blurred the distinction between vice as an incidental consequence of prosperity and vice as its cause: vice, said Hervey, "is the child of Prosperity, but not the Parent; and ... the Vices which grow upon a flourishing People, are not the Means by which they become so."[5] [5] [Lord Hervey], _Some Remarks on the Minute Philosopher_, London, 1732, pp. 22-23, 42-50. T. E. Jessop, in his introduction to his edition of _Alciphron_, characterizes Berkeley's account of the argument of _The Fable of the Bees_ as "not unfair," and says: "I can see no reason for whitewashing Mandeville. The content and manner of his writing invite retort rather than argument. Berkeley gives both, in the most sparkling of his dialogues. Mandeville wrote a feeble reply, A _Letter to Dion_."[6] F. B. Kaye, on the other hand, says of the exchange between Berkeley and Mandeville that "men like ... Berkeley, who may be termed the religious-minded ... in their anguish, threw logic to the winds, and criticized him [i.e., Mandeville] for the most inconsistent reasons."[7] [6] _Alciphron, or the Minute Philosopher_, T. E. Jessop, ed., in _The Works of George Berkeley, Bishop of Cloyne_. Edited by A. A. Luce and T. E. Jessop. London, etc., III. (1950), 9-10. [7] In his edition of _The Fable of the Bees_, Oxford, 1924, II. 415-416. All subsequent references to _The Fable of the Bees_ will be to this edition.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27  
28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Mandeville

 

Berkeley

 

Hervey

 

edition

 

Alciphron

 
argument
 

Jessop

 

Letter

 
Minute
 

prosperity


Philosopher

 

London

 

dialogues

 
sparkling
 

feeble

 
retort
 

unfair

 

characterizes

 
account
 

reason


whitewashing

 

content

 

introduction

 

invite

 

writing

 

manner

 

Edited

 

George

 
Bishop
 

Cloyne


Oxford

 
subsequent
 

references

 

reasons

 

termed

 

religious

 

exchange

 

minded

 

inconsistent

 

criticized


anguish

 

Remarks

 

blurred

 
dialogue
 

tended

 

weaknesses

 
displayed
 
criticism
 

claimed

 

opponent