FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228  
229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   >>   >|  
t" (or, myself), _sa ma [=a]tm[=a]_. The Brahmanic priest teaches that he is a god like other gods, and goes so far as to say that he may be united with a god after death. The Upanishad philosopher says 'I am God.'] [Footnote 2: Compare Scherman, _Philosophische Hymnen_, p. 93; above, p. 156.] [Footnote 3: Or, in other words, the thought of the Brahmanic period (not necessarily of extant Br[=a]hmanas) is synchronous with part of the Vedic collection.] [Footnote 4: The last additions to this class of literature would, of course, conform in language to their models, just as the late Vedic Mantras conform as well as their composers can make them to the older song or _chandas_ style.] [Footnote 5: Cited by Mueller in SBE. i. _Introd_. p. lxxxii.] [Footnote 6: Compare Weber, _Ind. Lit_. p. 171; Mueller, _loc. cit._ p. lxviii.] [Footnote 7: The relation between the Br[=a]hmanas (ritual works discussed in the last chapter) and the early Upanishads will be seen better with the help of a concrete example. As has been explained before, Rig Veda means to the Hindu not only the 'Collection' of hymns, but all the library connected with this collection; for instance, the two Br[=a]hmanas (of the Rig Veda), namely, the Aitareya and the K[=a]ush[=i]taki (or C[=a]nkh[=a]yana). Now, each of these Br[=a]hmanas concludes with an [=A]ranyaka, that is, a Forest-Book (_ara[n.]ya_, forest, solitude); and in each Forest Book is an Upanishad. For example, the third book of the K[=a]ush[=i]taki [=A]ranyaka is the K[=a]ush[=i]taki Upanishad. So the Ch[=a]ndogya and Brihad [=A]ranyaka belong respectively to the S[=a]man and Yajus.] [Footnote 8: This teaching is ascribed to C[=a]ndilya, to whose heresy, as opposed to the pure Vedantic doctrinc of Cankara, we shall have to revert in a later chapter. The heresy consists, in a word, in regarding the individual spirit as at any time distinct from the Supreme Spirit, though C[=a]ndilya teaches that it is ultimately absorbed into the latter.] [Footnote 9: "God' Who' is air, air (space) is God 'Who'," as if one said 'either is aether.'] [Footnote 10: 'Did penance over,' as one doing penance remains in meditation. 'Brooded' is Mueller's apt word for this _abhi-tap._]
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228  
229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

hmanas

 

ranyaka

 

Mueller

 

Upanishad

 

chapter

 
Brahmanic
 
Forest
 

teaches

 

heresy


conform

 

ndilya

 

collection

 

penance

 

Compare

 

Brihad

 

belong

 

ndogya

 

concludes

 
Aitareya

connected

 

instance

 

teaching

 

solitude

 

forest

 

ultimately

 

absorbed

 

aether

 
Brooded
 

meditation


remains

 

Spirit

 

revert

 

Cankara

 

doctrinc

 
opposed
 

Vedantic

 

consists

 

distinct

 

Supreme


library

 
individual
 

spirit

 

ascribed

 

Upanishads

 

thought

 
period
 

necessarily

 

extant

 
synchronous