FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346  
347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   >>   >|  
s; and hence mining laws relating to ownership are not of great age, although historical precedent may be traced far back. ON ALIENATED LANDS Where lands came into private ownership, or were "alienated" from the governments before the formulation of mining laws, varied procedures have been followed in different countries. In England and the United States, under the old regime in Russia, and to a slight extent in other parts of the world, mineral titles remain with the owner of the land and the government does not exercise the right of eminent domain. But even in England, where private property rights have been held peculiarly sacred, the discovery of oil during the later years of the war led to an attempt to expropriate the oil rights for the government. Because of the objection of landowners this attempt has not reached the statute books, but the movement is today an extremely live political question in England. A somewhat similar question is involved also in the movement to nationalize the coal resources of England, now being so vigorously urged by the labor party. In the United States, no serious attempt has yet been made to take over mineral resources from private ownership. Other countries have gone farther in retroactive measures in regard to alienated lands. Under the leadership of France, most of the countries of western Europe have appropriated to their governments the undiscovered mineral resources on private ground, particularly those beneath the surface, except where previously they had been specifically conveyed to the private owners, or with the exception of certain designated areas and minerals which had been conveyed to private ownership prior to certain dates. Some minerals occurring at the surface, variously specified and defined in different countries, are allowed to remain with the private owners, although often subject to government regulation in regard to their development and use. In varying degree this treatment of mineral resources on alienated lands is followed in the British colonial laws--in South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada--and in the Latin-American laws. The laws are usually based on specified classifications of minerals. Those occurring at or near the surface, and called "quarries," "placer deposits," "non-mines," or "surface deposits," usually remain with the surface owners. Those beneath the surface, called "sub-surface deposits" or "mines," in general belong
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346  
347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

surface

 

private

 
England
 

mineral

 

ownership

 
countries
 
resources
 
alienated
 

attempt

 

minerals


deposits
 

owners

 

remain

 
government
 
rights
 
mining
 
question
 

regard

 

movement

 
beneath

States

 

conveyed

 

occurring

 

governments

 

United

 
called
 

ground

 

relating

 

previously

 

quarries


placer

 

undiscovered

 
farther
 

retroactive

 

measures

 

belong

 

general

 
western
 

Europe

 

appropriated


France

 

leadership

 

specifically

 

exception

 

degree

 
treatment
 
British
 

varying

 

regulation

 

development