FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277  
278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   >>   >|  
d out a wedge, and becoming slightly deflected, cut a vertical groove to the base of the mandible; _exit_, in left submaxillary triangle. The bullet subsequently re-entered the chest wall just below the clavicle, and escaped at the anterior axillary fold. The appearance of these second wounds suggested only slight setting up of the bullet; the original impact was no doubt of an oblique or lateral character. The injury was followed by free haemorrhage and remarkably abundant salivation (I was inclined to think that the latter symptom was particularly well marked in gunshot fractures of the body of the mandible), and very great swelling of the floor of the mouth. The patient could not bear any form of apparatus, but was assiduous in washing out his mouth, and made a good recovery, the fragments being in good apposition. (83) _Entry_ (Mauser), over the right malar eminence; the bullet carried away all the right upper and lower molars, fractured the mandible, and was retained in the neck. A fortnight later an abscess formed in the lower part of the neck, which was opened (Mr. Pooley), and portions of the mantle and leaden core, together with numerous fragments of the teeth, were removed. The bullet had undergone fragmentation on impact, probably on the last one (teeth of mandible), and still retained sufficient force to enter the neck. This case affords an interesting example of transmission of force from the bullet to the teeth, and bears on the theory of explosive action. In the treatment of fractures of the upper jaw, interference was rarely needed. In the case of the mandible, a remark has already been made as to the advisability of removing fragments when the neck of the condyle has suffered comminution. The removal of loose fragments is necessary in all cases in which the buccal cavity is involved. Experience in fracture of the limbs has shown a tendency to quiet necrosis when comminution was severe, in spite of primary union. This is no doubt dependent on the very free separation of fragments on the entry and exit aspects from their enveloping periosteum. In the case of the mandible, considerable necrosis is inevitable, and much time is saved by the primary removal of all actually loose fragments. A splint of the ordinary chin-cap type with a four-tailed bandage meets all further req
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277  
278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

mandible

 

fragments

 

bullet

 

fractures

 

comminution

 

impact

 
removal
 
retained
 

necrosis

 

primary


splint

 

affords

 

ordinary

 

sufficient

 

interesting

 

theory

 

explosive

 

transmission

 

removed

 
numerous

leaden

 

action

 

tailed

 

fragmentation

 

bandage

 

undergone

 

treatment

 

buccal

 
separation
 

dependent


aspects

 

cavity

 

involved

 

tendency

 

severe

 
Experience
 

fracture

 

suffered

 

needed

 

remark


considerable

 
inevitable
 

rarely

 

interference

 

periosteum

 

removing

 
mantle
 

condyle

 

advisability

 
enveloping