FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49  
50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   >>   >|  
nglish contains twelve simple terms; Sanskrit has twenty-seven, while Japanese possesses twenty-four, and the Chinese a number almost equally great. Very many languages, as might be expected, contain special numeral expressions, such as the German _dutzend_ and the French _dizaine_; but these, like the English _dozen_ and _score_, are not to be regarded as numerals proper. The formation of numeral words shows at a glance the general method in which any number scale has been built up. The primitive savage counts on his fingers until he has reached the end of one, or more probably of both, hands. Then, if he wishes to proceed farther, some mark is made, a pebble is laid aside, a knot tied, or some similar device employed to signify that all the counters at his disposal have been used. Then the count begins anew, and to avoid multiplication of words, as well as to assist the memory, the terms already used are again resorted to; and the name by which the first halting-place was designated is repeated with each new numeral. Hence the thirteen, fourteen, fifteen, etc., which are contractions of the fuller expressions three-and-ten, four-and-ten, five-and-ten, etc. The specific method of combination may not always be the same, as witness the _eighteen_, or eight-ten, in English, and _dix-huit,_ or ten-eight, in French; _forty-five_, or four-tens-five, in English, and _fuenf und vierzig_, or five and four tens in German. But the general method is the same the world over, presenting us with nothing but local variations, which are, relatively speaking, entirely unimportant. With this fact in mind, we can cease to wonder at the small number of simple numerals in any language. It might, indeed, be queried, why do any languages, English and German, for example, have unusual compounds for 11 and 12? It would seem as though the regular method of compounding should begin with 10 and 1, instead of 10 and 3, in any language using a system with 10 as a base. An examination of several hundred numeral scales shows that the Teutonic languages are somewhat exceptional in this respect. The words _eleven_ and _twelve_ are undoubtedly combinations, but not in the same direct sense as _thirteen_, _twenty-five_, etc. The same may be said of the French _onze_, _douze_, _treize_, _quatorze_, _quinze_, and _seize_, which are obvious compounds, but not formed in the same manner as the numerals above that point. Almost all civilized languages, however,
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49  
50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

method

 

numeral

 

languages

 

English

 
French
 

numerals

 

twenty

 

German

 

number

 

compounds


simple
 

language

 
twelve
 
general
 

expressions

 

thirteen

 
vierzig
 

queried

 
variations
 
eighteen

speaking

 

witness

 

unimportant

 

presenting

 
direct
 
combinations
 

exceptional

 

respect

 

eleven

 

undoubtedly


treize

 
quatorze
 

Almost

 

civilized

 

manner

 
quinze
 

obvious

 

formed

 
Teutonic
 

regular


compounding

 

unusual

 

examination

 
hundred
 

scales

 

system

 

memory

 

primitive

 

savage

 

glance