FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70  
71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   >>   >|  
words. While discussing in a previous chapter the limits of number systems, we found many instances where anything above 2 or 3 was designated by some one of the comprehensive terms _much_, _many_, _very many_; these words, or such equivalents as _lot_, _heap_, or _plenty_, serving as an aid to the finger pantomime necessary to indicate numbers for which they have no real names. The low degree of intelligence and civilization revealed by such words is brought quite as sharply into prominence by the word occasionally found for 5. Whenever the fingers and hands are used at all, it would seem natural to expect for 5 some general expression signifying _hand_, for 10 _both hands_, and for 20 _man_. Such is, as we have already seen, the ordinary method of progression, but it is not universal. A drop in the scale of civilization takes us to a point where 10, instead of 20, becomes the whole man. The Kusaies,[110] of Strong's Island, call 10 _sie-nul_, 1 man, 30 _tol-nul_, 3 men, 40 _a naul_, 4 men, etc.; and the Ku-Mbutti[111] of central Africa have _mukko_, 10, and _moku_, man. If 10 is to be expressed by reference to the man, instead of his hands, it might appear more natural to employ some such expression as that adopted by the African Pigmies,[112] who call 10 _mabo_, and man _mabo-mabo_. With them, then, 10 is perhaps "half a man," as it actually is among the Towkas of South America; and we have already seen that with the Aztecs it was _matlactli_, the "hand half" of a man.[113] The same idea crops out in the expression used by the Nicobar Islanders for 30--_heam-umdjome ruktei_, 1 man (and a) half.[114] Such nomenclature is entirely natural, and it accords with the analogy offered by other words of frequent occurrence in the numeral scales of savage races. Still, to find 10 expressed by the term _man_ always conveys an impression of mental poverty; though it may, of course, be urged that this might arise from the fact that some races never use the toes in counting, but go over the fingers again, or perhaps bring into requisition the fingers of a second man to express the second 10. It is not safe to postulate an extremely low degree of civilization from the presence of certain peculiarities of numeral formation. Only the most general statements can be ventured on, and these are always subject to modification through some circumstance connected with environment, mode of living, or intercourse with other tribes. Two South Am
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70  
71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
expression
 

natural

 

fingers

 
civilization
 

general

 

numeral

 
expressed
 

degree

 

occurrence

 
accords

limits

 

frequent

 

analogy

 
scales
 
number
 

offered

 

conveys

 

impression

 
mental
 

poverty


previous

 

chapter

 

savage

 

ruktei

 

systems

 

Aztecs

 

matlactli

 

America

 

Towkas

 

instances


umdjome

 

Islanders

 
Nicobar
 

nomenclature

 

ventured

 
subject
 

statements

 

peculiarities

 

formation

 

modification


intercourse

 

tribes

 
living
 

circumstance

 

connected

 
environment
 

presence

 
counting
 
discussing
 
postulate