FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58  
59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   >>   >|  
protruded from the oblique end. The wick was dipped in alcohol, ignited, and inserted briefly into the cup. The torch was more convenient than the older teapot lamp because it was easier to insert into the cup, and was small enough to hold in the hand at the same time as one held the scarificator.[107] The introduction of the scarificator represented the major change in the art of cupping between antiquity and the nineteenth century. Unlike later attempts at improving cupping technology, the scarificator was almost universally adopted. Previous to its invention, the cupper, following ancient practice, severed the capillaries by making a series of parallel incisions with a lancet, fleam, or other surgical knife.[108] This was a messy, time consuming, and painful procedure. Ambroise Pare (1510?-1590) was the first to employ the word "scarificator" and the first to illustrate a special instrument for scarification in his compendium of surgical instruments.[109] However, a precursor to the scarificator had been suggested by Paulus of Aegina (625-690), who described an instrument constructed of three lancets joined together so that in one application three incisions could be made in the skin. The instrument, recommended for the removal of coagulated blood in the wake of a blow, was considered difficult to use and was not generally adopted.[110] Pare's scarificator had a circular case and eighteen blades attached to three rods projecting from the bottom. A pin projecting from the side may have served to lift the blades and a button on the top to release them although Pare did not describe the spring mechanism.[111] Pare did not recommend the instrument for cupping, but rather for the treatment of gangrene. Several sixteenth- and seventeenth-century surgical texts made reference to Pare's instrument, among them Jacques Delechamps (1569) and Hellkiah Crooke (1631).[112] It is not known who made the first square scarificator and adapted it to cupping. The instrument was not found in Dionis (1708), but it did appear in Heister (1719) and in Garengeot (1725). Thus it appears that the scarificator was invented between 1708 and 1719. Garengeot disliked cupping in general and he had little good to say of the new mechanical scarificator. "A nasty instrument," he called it, "good only for show."[113] The German surgeon, Lorenz Heister, was more appreciative of the innovation. After describing the older method of making sixteen to tw
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58  
59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
scarificator
 

instrument

 

cupping

 

surgical

 

Heister

 

Garengeot

 
adopted
 

making

 

incisions

 
century

projecting

 

blades

 

considered

 

difficult

 
release
 

describe

 

recommend

 
coagulated
 

mechanism

 

attached


spring

 

bottom

 
circular
 

button

 

eighteen

 

served

 
generally
 

Hellkiah

 
mechanical
 
called

appears

 

invented

 

disliked

 

general

 

describing

 

method

 

sixteen

 

innovation

 

German

 
surgeon

Lorenz
 

appreciative

 

reference

 

Jacques

 
Delechamps
 

seventeenth

 

treatment

 
gangrene
 

Several

 

sixteenth