FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319  
320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   >>   >|  
other hand, Christians looked upon the question as a matter of conscience and morality and regarded the worship of the princeps as an act of idolatry. They could pray for him, but not to him. These two points of view were impossible of reconciliation. Furthermore, since the worship of the state gods formed such an integral part of the public life of each community, it was inevitable that those who refused to participate in this worship should be looked upon as atheists and public enemies. On another ground also the Christians were liable to punishment under the _lex maiestatis_, namely, as forming unauthorized religious associations. These constituted the crimes for which the Christians were actually punished from the close of the first to the middle of the third century of our era. *Popular accusations against the Christians.* However, throughout this period the state did not take the initiative against Christians as such, but only dealt with those individuals against whom specific charges were laid by private initiative or the action of local magistrates. These popular accusations charged the Christians with forming illegal associations, with seeking the destruction of mankind (as _odiatores humani generis_), and with perpetrating all sorts of monstrous crimes in their religious rites. Such accusations were partly due to the belief of the early Christian church in the immediate coming of the kingdom of Christ, to their consequent scorn of wealth and public honors, and to the secrecy which surrounded the exercise of their religion. *The imperial policy from Trajan to Maximus.* The attitude of the Roman government towards the Christians in the early second century is clearly seen from the correspondence between Trajan and Pliny the younger, the governor of Bithynia in 112 A. D. This correspondence fails to reveal any specific law prohibiting Christianity, but shows that the admission of the name of Christian, accompanied by the refusal to worship the gods of the state and the princeps, constituted sufficient grounds for punishment. Thus a great deal of discretion was left to the provincial governor, who was directed to pay no attention to anonymous accusations but who was expected to repress Christianity whenever its spread caused conflicts with the non-Christian element under his authority. A rescript of Hadrian to Minucius Fundanus, proconsul of Asia, ordained that Christians should receive the benefit of a regular
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319  
320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Christians

 
worship
 
accusations
 

Christian

 
public
 
forming
 

punishment

 

Christianity

 

governor

 

initiative


Trajan

 

specific

 
century
 

associations

 
constituted
 

crimes

 

correspondence

 
religious
 

looked

 

princeps


reveal

 

Bithynia

 

younger

 

government

 

wealth

 
honors
 

secrecy

 

consequent

 
Christ
 

coming


kingdom

 

surrounded

 

exercise

 

Maximus

 
attitude
 

question

 

policy

 

religion

 

matter

 
imperial

element
 
authority
 

conflicts

 

caused

 

spread

 

rescript

 

Hadrian

 

receive

 
benefit
 

regular