FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38  
39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   >>   >|  
ary purposes. With the Colonies so loyal and so willing to assist Great Britain in time of trouble and danger, how was it that in a decade the Empire was shattered and the major portion of the Colonies were busy building up a nation of their own? At this distance of time it is still hard to view the question dispassionately. Who was responsible for this great criminal folly? Was it some individual? Was it the old Colonial policy? Or, was it petty parish politics? The trend of political thought in the Colonies has generally been the antithesis of political thought in Great Britain. Colonial thought has always been an enigma to the British. Of recent years it has been both disturbing and confusing. The Colonial, who, with his own eyes, within the span of a few years in his own country, views the transition of a bit of landscape from barbarism to civilization, the hunter giving way to the shepherd, the herder to the farmer, cities and towns springing up over night with factories and banking established in a few months, seldom arrives at the same political conclusion as the theorist who tries to conjure up the genesis of political economy from books and musty documents. His is the school of hard experience, which teaches lessons that fine-spun theories cannot upset. It is so with his Colonial theories of economics and government. The dead weight of tradition does not hang around his neck where State affairs are concerned and precedent only counts when it is right and just. Governor Pownall, of New Jersey, immediately previous to the time of the Revolutionary war, wrote a book, entitled: "The Administration of the British Colonies." In this work he pointed out the necessity of closer political union between the Colonies and the mother country; in fact, he outlined an Imperial constitution. He pointed out that there had always existed two lines of thought among English-speaking people. One favored unity, centralization, Imperialism, the other disunion, or individualism, claiming that in the absolute independence of each small unit of the Empire rested liberty and freedom. This struggle is still on. [Illustration: CAPT. R. CLIFFORD DARLING, ADJUTANT] Had Pitt followed up his idea of uniting the Colonies into a Dominion, or into an even greater union such as he was pressed then to do, the American Revolution would in all probability have been averted. But Pitt's energies were turned to the war then bei
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38  
39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Colonies
 

political

 
Colonial
 

thought

 
British
 
Britain
 
theories
 

pointed

 

Empire

 

country


necessity

 

closer

 

constitution

 

existed

 

English

 

outlined

 

Imperial

 

mother

 

entitled

 

counts


precedent

 

concerned

 

affairs

 

Governor

 
Pownall
 
speaking
 

Administration

 

Revolutionary

 

Jersey

 

immediately


previous

 
disunion
 
ADJUTANT
 

DARLING

 

CLIFFORD

 

struggle

 

Illustration

 

uniting

 

Dominion

 
pressed

American
 
Revolution
 

probability

 

greater

 
freedom
 

turned

 

energies

 

individualism

 

Imperialism

 
favored