er-in to Lord Dashingham in the seventeen-seventies particularly
delights me.--I am,
Yours faithfully,
VICTOR PUTTENHAM
VI
From Sir Jonathan Puttenham to the Editor of _The Mustershire Herald and
Oldcaster Advertiser_
DEAR SIR,--I shall be obliged if you will make no more references in
_The Herald_ to the new _Mustershire Archaeological Records'_ article on
the Puttenhams. It is not that it lays emphasis on the humble origin of
that family. That is nothing to me. But I am at the moment engaged in a
correspondence with the Editor on the propriety of publishing private or
semi-private records of this character without first asking permission,
and as he will possibly see the advisability of withdrawing the article
in question there should be as little reference to it in the Press as
possible.--I am,
Yours faithfully,
JONATHAN PUTTENHAM
VII
The Rev. Stacey Morris to Sir Jonathan Puttenham
The Editor of _The Mustershire Archaeological Society's Records_ begs to
acknowledge Sir Jonathan Puttenham's letter of the 15th inst. He regrets
that the publication of the Puttenham genealogy should have so offended
Sir Jonathan, but would point out, firstly, that it has for years been a
custom of these Records to include such articles; secondly, that the
volume has now been delivered to all the Society's members; thirdly,
that there are members of the Puttenham family who do not at all share
Sir Jonathan's views; and, fourthly, that if such views obtained
generally the valuable and interesting pursuit of genealogy, of which
our President, Lord Hammerton, to name no others, is so ardent a patron,
would cease to be practised.
VIII
Miss Lydia Puttenham, of "Weald View," Rusper Common, Tunbridge Wells,
to Lady Puttenham
DEAR COUSIN MILDRED,--I wonder if Sir Victor has seen the article on our
family in _The Archaeological Records_. I am so vexed about it, not only
for myself and all of us, but particularly for him and you. It is not
right that a busy man working for humanity, as he is doing, should be
worried like that. Indeed I feel so strongly about it that I have sent
in my resignation as a member of the Society. Why such things should be
printed at all I cannot see. It is most unfair and unnecessary to go
into such details, nor can there be the slightest reason for doing so,
for the result is the dullest reading. Perhaps Sir Victor could get it
stopped. Again expressing my sympathy, I am,
Yours af
|