f the Revolution Church,[83] and with
many other seers and seeresses of this order, who all bear a family
likeness to one another.
[Footnote 80: _Acta Sanctorum_, 1675, April, iii, 851.]
[Footnote 81: _Ibid._, March 1, 1532.]
[Footnote 82: Le Pere Hugues de Saint-Francois, _Les grandeurs de Sainte
Anne_, Rennes, 1657, in 8vo; L'abbe Max Nicol, _Sainte-Anne-d'Auray_,
Paris, Brussels, s.d., in 8vo, pp. 37 _et seq._ M. le Docteur G. de
Closmadeuc has kindly lent me his valuable work, as yet unpublished,
on Yves Nicolazic, which is characterised by the same exactness of
information and of criticism as are to be found in his studies of
local history.]
[Footnote 83: _Recueil des ouvrages de la celebre Mademoiselle
Labrousse, du Bourg de Vauxains, en Perigord, canton de Ribeirac de la
Dordogne, actuellement prisonniere au chateau Saint-Ange, a Rome_,
Bordeaux, 1797, in 8vo; E. Lairtullier, _Les femmes celebres de 1789 a
1795_, Paris, 1842, in 8vo, vol. i, pp. 212 _et seq._; Abbe Chr.
Moreau, _Une mystique revolutionnaire Suzette Labrousse_, Paris, 1886,
in 8vo; A. France, _Susette Labrousse_, Paris, 1907, in 12mo.]
Three visionaries especially are closely related to Jeanne. The
earliest in date is a vavasour of Champagne, who had a mission to speak
to King John; of this holy man I have written sufficiently in the
present work. The second is a farrier of Salon, who had a mission to
speak to Louis XIV; the third, a peasant of Gallardon, named Martin,
who had a mission to speak to Louis XVIII. Articles on the farrier and
the farmer, who both saw apparitions and showed signs to their
respective kings, will be found in the appendices at the end of this
work.[84] In spite of difference in sex, the points of similarity
between Jeanne d'Arc and these three men are very close and very
significant; they are inherent in the very nature of Jeanne and her
fellow visionaries; and the variations, which at a first glance might
seem to separate widely the latter from Jeanne, are aesthetic, social,
historical, and consequently external and contingent. Between them and
her there are of course striking contrasts in appearance and in
fortune. They were entirely wanting in that charm which she never
failed to exercise; and it is a fact that while they failed miserably
she grew in strength and flowered in legend. But it is the duty of the
scientific mind to recognise common characteristics, proving identity
of origin alike in the noblest
|