FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104  
105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   >>   >|  
n to force Greece into the War, and on his part disavowed any wish or intention to hinder in any way the freedom of their movements on land or sea, or to compromise in any way the security of their troops. The Hellenic Government had always kept the promises made by M. Zaimis to the very utmost of its ability, and had no difficulty in renewing the assurance that the Allied Governments would continue to receive all the facilities their troops might require in the port of Salonica, and on the roads and railways.[15] These prefatory amenities led on 10 December to a detailed Agreement, the Greek Government promising to move its troops out of the way and "not to oppose by force the construction of defensive works or the occupation of fortified points," but reserving to itself the right to protest {84} against such operations "energetically and seriously, not as a mere form"--a right which the Allies easily conceded[16]--and emphatically declaring that "should the Allied troops by their movements bring the war into Greek territory, the Greek troops would withdraw so as to leave the field free to the two parties to settle their differences." The Entente Ministers expressed their satisfaction, and M. Skouloudis expressed the hope that their Governments, convinced at last of the Greek Government's sincerity, would not only drop coercion, but comply with its request for financial and commercial facilities. They promised that all difficulties would disappear as soon as the military authorities on the spot had given effect to the agreement; and the French Minister repeated his Government's declaration that it would be happy to accord Greece all financial and commercial facilities as soon as the situation cleared.[17] [1] _Journal Officiel_, pp. 61, 70, 75-8. [2] Sir George Arthur's _Life of Lord Kitchener_. Vol. III. p. 261. [3] _White Book_, Nos. 47, 48, 49. [4] Skouloudis's _Apantesis_, pp. 43-5. [5] _White Book_, No. 52. [6] _White Book_, No. 51. [7] Sarrail, pp. 311-12; _Life of Kitchener_, Vol. III, p. 198. [8] Those were the figures on 17 Nov.--_Life of Kitchener_, Vol. III, p. 199. I have only seen an answer to the second of the above questions: it is from M. Venizelos, and it is: "absent-mindedness": "Why did not the General Staff do this, since it was to Germany's interest that the Anglo-French should not land? Because, immersed in politics, it no longer took account of military matters!"--
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104  
105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

troops

 

Government

 

facilities

 
Kitchener
 
Greece
 

Allied

 

Governments

 

French

 
commercial
 

movements


financial
 

Skouloudis

 

expressed

 

military

 

authorities

 

effect

 

Arthur

 

disappear

 
difficulties
 

cleared


repeated

 

declaration

 

situation

 

accord

 

Journal

 

Officiel

 

agreement

 

Minister

 

George

 

General


mindedness

 

absent

 
questions
 

Venizelos

 

longer

 

politics

 

account

 
matters
 
immersed
 

Because


Germany

 
interest
 

answer

 

Sarrail

 
Apantesis
 
promised
 

figures

 

settle

 

railways

 

prefatory