FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124  
125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   >>   >|  
mired by Mackintosh,[155] who, of course, did not accept the principles, and had a warm disciple in Charles Richardson (1775-1865), who wrote in its defence against Dugald Stewart and accepted its authority in his elaborate dictionary of the English language.[156] But its chief interest for us is that it was a great authority with James Mill. Mill accepts the etymologies, and there is much in common between the two writers, though Mill had learned his main doctrines elsewhere, especially from Hobbes. What the agreement really shows is how the intellectual idiosyncrasy which is congenial to 'nominalism' in philosophy was also congenial to Tooke's matter of fact radicalism and to the Utilitarian position of Bentham and his followers. NOTES: [144] Published originally in 1778; reprinted in edition of EPEA PTEROENTA or _Diversions of Purley_, by Richard Taylor (1829), to which I refer. The first part of the _Diversions of Purley_ appeared in 1786; and the second part (with a new edition of the first) in 1798. [145] _Diversions of Purley_ (1829), i. 12, 131. [146] _Ibid._ ii. 362. Locke's work, says Prof. Max Mueller in his _Science of Thought_, p. 295, 'is, as Lange in his _History of Materialism_ rightly perceived, a critique of language which, together with Kant's _Critique of the Pure Reason_, forms the starting-point of modern philosophy.' _See_ Lange's _Materialism_, (1873), i. 271. [147] _Ibid._ i. 49. [148] _Diversions of Purley_, i. 36, 42. [149] _Ibid._ i. 373. [150] _Ibid._ i. 374. [151] _Diversions of Purley_, ii. 18. Cf. Mill's statement in _Analysis_, i. 304, that 'abstract terms are concrete terms with the connotation dropped.' [152] _Ibid._ ii. 9, etc. [153] _Ibid._ ii. 399. [154] Stephens, ii. 497. [155] _Life of Mackintosh_, ii. 235-37. [156] Begun for the _Encyclopaedia Metropolitana_ in 1818; and published in 1835-37. Dugald Stewart's chief criticism is in his Essays (_Works_, v. 149-188). John Fearn published his _Anti-Tooke_ in 1820. II. DUGALD STEWART If English philosophy was a blank, there was still a leader of high reputation in Scotland. Dugald Stewart (1753-1828) had a considerable influence upon the Utilitarians. He represented, on the one hand, the doctrines which they thought themselves specially bound to attack, and it may perhaps be held that in some ways he betrayed to them the key of the position. Stewart[157] was son of a professor of mathematics at
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124  
125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Purley

 

Diversions

 

Stewart

 

philosophy

 

Dugald

 
doctrines
 

congenial

 

published

 

position

 

Mackintosh


Materialism
 

edition

 

language

 

English

 

authority

 

Encyclopaedia

 

Metropolitana

 
Stephens
 

Analysis

 

starting


modern

 

concrete

 

connotation

 

dropped

 

abstract

 

statement

 
specially
 
attack
 

thought

 
represented

professor

 

mathematics

 

betrayed

 
Utilitarians
 

DUGALD

 

criticism

 

Essays

 

STEWART

 
considerable
 

influence


Scotland

 

reputation

 

leader

 

Hobbes

 

learned

 

common

 
writers
 
agreement
 

matter

 

radicalism