e, op. cit. Part III.
p. 3. (It should be noted that Mr. Castle's paper is strongly in favour
of the Templars.)
[152] Ibid., I. 4.
[153] _Proces des Templiers_, I. 5.
[154] Michelet in Preface to Vol. I. of _Proces des Templiers_.
[155] Jules Loiseleur, _La Doctrine Secrete des Templiers_, p. 40
(1872).
[156] Ibid., p. 16.
[157] _Proceedings against the Templars in France and England for
Heresy_, by E. J. Castle, Part I. p. 16, quoting Rymer, Vol. III. p. 37
[158] Ibid., Part II. p. 1.
[159] Ibid., Part II. pp. 25-7.
[160] Ibid., Part II. p. 30.
[161] "Another witness of the Minor Friars told the Commissioners he had
heard from Brother Robert of Tukenham that a Templar had a son who saw
through a partition that they asked one professing if he believed in the
Crucified, showing him the figure, whom they killed upon his refusing to
deny Him, but the boy, some time after, being asked if he wished to be a
Templar said no, because he had seen this thing done. Saying this, he
was killed by his father.... The twenty-third witness, a Knight, said
that his uncle entered the Order healthy and joyfully, with his birds
and dogs, and the third day following he was dead, and he suspected it
was on account of the crimes he had heard of them, and that the cause of
his death was he would not consent to the evil deeds perpetrated by
other brethren."--Ibid., Part II. p. 13.
[162] F. Funck-Brentano, _Le Moyen Age_, p. 396 (1922).
[163] Ibid., p. 384.
[164] F. Funck Brentano, op. cit., p. 396.
[165] Ibid., p. 387.
[166] Dean Milman, _History of Latin Christianity_, VII. 213.
[167] E.J. Castle, op. cit., Part I. p. 22.
[168] Thus even M. Mollat admits: "En tout cas leurs depositions,
defavorables a l'Ordre, l'impressionnerent si vivement que, par une
serie de graves mesures, il abandonna une a une toutes ses
oppositions."--_Les Papes d'Avignon_, p. 242.
[169] F. Funck-Brentano, op. cit., p. 392.
[170] E.J. Castle, _Proceedings against the Templars, A.Q.C._, Vol. XX.
Part III, p. 3.
[171] Even Raynouard, the apologist of the Templars (op. cit., p. 19),
admits that, if less unjust and violent measures had been adopted, the
interest of the State and the safety of the throne might have justified
the abolition of the Order.
[172] Funck-Brentano, op. cit., p. 386.
[173] "The bourgeoisie, whenever it has conquered power, has destroyed
all feudal, patriarchal, and idyllic relations. It has pitiless
|