this view those other Degrees (which for convenience
may be called Additional Degrees) are not real Masonry at all, but an
extraneous and spontaneous growth springing up around the 'Craft'
proper, later in date, and mostly foreign, i.e. non-British in origin,
and the existence of _any_ such degrees is by some writers condemned as
a contamination of the 'pure Ancient Freemasonry' of our
forefathers."--_A.Q.C._, XXXII. Part I. p. 5.
[390] J. J. Mounier, _De l'Influence attribuee aux Philosophes, aux
Francs-Macons et aux Illumines sur la Revolution Francaise_, p. 148
(1822). See also letter from the Duke of Northumberland at Alnwick to
General Rainsford dated January 19, 1799, defending Barruel from the
charge of attacking Masonry and pointing out that he only indicated the
upper degrees, _A.Q.C._, XXVI, p. 112.
[391] Em. Rebold, _Histoire des Trots Grandes Loges de Francs-Macons en
France_, pp. 9, 10 (1864).
[392] _A.Q.C._, XXXII. Part I. 21.
[393] _A.Q.C._, XXXII. Part I. 22. It is curious that in this discussion
by members of the Quatuor Coronati Lodge the influence of the Templars,
which provides the only key to the situation, is almost entirely
ignored.
[394] Yarker, _The Arcane Schools_, pp. 479-82.
[395] Mackey, _Lexicon of Freemasonry_, p. 119.
[396] _Martines de Pasqually_, par Papus, president du Supreme Conseil
de l'Ordre Martiniste, p. 144 (1895). Papus is the pseudonym of Dr.
Gerard Encausse.
[397] Gould, _History of Freemasonry_, III. 241.
[398] See the very important article on this question that appeared in
_The National Review_ for February 1923, showing that Carlyle was
assisted gratuitously throughout his work by a German Jew named Joseph
Neuberg and was supplied with information and finally decorated by the
Prussian Government.
[399] Executed in 1746 as a partisan of the Stuarts.
[400] Gould, op. cit., Vol. III. pp. 101, 110; _A.Q.C._, Vol. XXXII.
Part I. p. 31.
[401] A. E. Waite, _The Secret Tradition in Freemasonry_, I. 296, 370,
415.
[402] Clavel (_Histoire pittoresque de la Franc-Maconnerie_, p. 185)
says it was afterwards discovered that "the Pretender, far from having
made de Hundt a Templar, on the contrary was made a Templar by him." But
other authorities deny that Prince Charles Edward was initiated even
into Freemasonry.
[403] Lecouteulx de Canteleu, _Les Sectes et Societes Secretes_, p. 242;
Clavel, op. cit., p. 184.
[404] Gould, op. cit., III. 100.
[40
|