FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295  
296   297   298   >>  
Webb, The History of Trade Unionism, pp. 147-148. [45] _Compte-Rendu_ of the Third National Congress of the French Socialist Party, 1906, pp. 189-192. [46] _Idem_, p. 186. [47] Jaures, Studies in Socialism, pp. 127-128. [48] _Idem_, pp. 124-125. [49] _Idem_, pp. 128-129. [50] _Compte-Rendu_ of the Fourth International Congress of the International Working Men's Association, Basel, 1869, p. 6. [51] Kropotkin, The Great French Revolution, p. 423 (G. P. Putnam's Sons, New York, 1909). [52] Proudhon, _Idee Generale de la Revolution au XIXe. Siecle_, p. 304 (Garnier Freres, Paris, 1851). [53] _Idem_, p. 197. CHAPTER XI [1] Proudhon, _Idee Generale de la Revolution_, p. 149. [2] Roger A. Pryor, quoted in the report of the Investigation of the Employment of Pinkerton Detectives: House Special Committee Report, 1892, p. 225. [3] Investigation of the Employment of Pinkerton Detectives: Senate Special Committee Report, 1892, p. 247. [4] Thomas Beet, Methods of American Private Detective Agencies, _Appleton's Magazine_, October, 1906. [5] _Idem._ [6] _Idem._ [7] _Idem._ [8] _New York Sun_, May 8, 1911. [9] _New York Call_, September 14, 1910. [10] Investigation of the Employment of Pinkerton Detectives: House Special Committee Report, 1892, p. 226. [11] See his testimony, pp. 92-94 of the Senate Report. [12] Report of the Industrial Commission, 1901, Vol. VIII, pp. 257-258, 261 (Chicago Labor Disputes). [13] _American Federationist_, November, 1911, Vol. XVIII, p. 889. [14] Limiting Federal Injunction: Hearings before a Subcommittee of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Jan. 6, 1913, Part I, p. 19. [15] _Idem_, p. 20. [16] _Appleton's Magazine_, October, 1906. [17] Hillquit, History of Socialism in the United States, pp. 280-281. [18] Investigation of the Employment of Pinkerton Detectives, Senate Special Committee Report, 1892, p. xiii. [19] _Idem_, p. ii. [20] _Idem_, p. xii. [21] _Idem_, p. xv. [22] Investigation of the Employment of Pinkerton Detectives: House Special Committee Report, 1892, p. 224. [23] _Idem_, p. 225. [24] Report on the Chicago Strike of June-July, 1894, by the United States Strike Commission, p. xxxviii. [25] _Idem_, p. xliv. [26] _Idem_, p. 356. [27] _Idem_, p. 370. [28] _Idem_, p. 397. [29] _Idem_, pp. 366-367. [30] _Idem_, p. 371. [31] _Idem_, p. 368. [32] _Idem_, pp. 368-369.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295  
296   297   298   >>  



Top keywords:

Report

 

Committee

 

Pinkerton

 

Employment

 

Special

 

Investigation

 

Detectives

 

Senate

 

Revolution

 

States


United

 

Generale

 

Proudhon

 

Commission

 

American

 

Chicago

 

Magazine

 

Appleton

 

October

 

Congress


French

 
Strike
 

Socialism

 

Compte

 

History

 

International

 
Disputes
 
Federationist
 
testimony
 
Industrial

November

 

Limiting

 

Hillquit

 

Subcommittee

 

Hearings

 
Injunction
 
Federal
 

Judiciary

 

xxxviii

 

Working


Association

 

Fourth

 

Putnam

 

Kropotkin

 
National
 

Unionism

 

Socialist

 
Jaures
 

Studies

 

Methods