int of appearance he
resembles him, except that the person I served had whiskers." Now if you
recollect the history of the whiskers, it is established that he had
worn whiskers, though the woman who endeavoured to make us believe that
he slept at home on the Sunday night, said she had not so much as
observed (though she had been his servant two years and a half) whether
he had any whiskers. It appears to me that is a circumstance in the
countenance of a person which one would very much observe; he says, "the
person I saw in Parliament-street had not whiskers;" he then looked at
Mr. De Berenger, and said, "this is the person I was introduced to at
the coffee house in Parliament-street; I really cannot undertake to
swear that he is the person, the gentleman that represented himself to
be Mr. Wilson, was dressed in a different manner, he had black whiskers,
and from that circumstance I could not possibly undertake to swear it
was the same person, it resembles the person, except that the person I
served had whiskers, I cannot say that I believe it is the person, or
that it is not."
Mrs. Abigail Davidson, the woman with whom Mr. De Berenger lodged, is
then called; she says, "In the month of February last I resided in the
Asylum Buildings, near to the Asylum; the house is within the Rules of
the King's Bench. Mr. De Berenger lodged with me; he finally quitted my
house on the 27th of February, on a Sunday. I do not remember where he
was on the Sunday before that, I did not see him on the morning of that
Sunday; I cannot say whether he slept at home that night, we never
attended to the door; I usually heard him in the morning, I did not hear
him as usual on the morning of the 21st; I used to hear the bell ring
for the servant, more than once; he occupied the whole of the upper part
of the house, I and my husband had the two parlours. I heard him also
occasionally playing the violin and trumpet, and he used to walk about;
he then wore whiskers. I generally heard his bell; I did not see him
come home on the Monday; I saw him in the evening, about half past
five; I had heard him in the afternoon. He quitted my house on the
Sunday after; I remember a gentleman calling on the Saturday night, the
day before he quitted, with a letter; I have since seen that gentleman
again, I saw him at the Temple; Mr. Lavie was then present. I cannot say
that I positively knew the gentleman, but I think it was the same that I
had seen deliver the le
|