FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268  
269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   >>   >|  
d not usually do it? _A._ I have done it differently; I have said "De Berenger to Johnstone." _Q._ But you give it a date? _A._ I have dated it above those words, as usual. _Q._ When you receive a letter, you authenticate the period of receiving it, but not the date of a letter received by another. _A._ I generally do; I enclose it in the letter to which it refers. _Mr. Scarlett._ Was it so done in this instance? _A._ It was. _Lord Ellenborough._ Have you any letter-book? _A._ I do not keep a letter-book; but I keep my letters very regularly tied up. _Mr. Scarlett._ You have heard the contents of the letter from De Berenger to Mr. Johnstone read. _A._ Yes. _Q._ That refers to some documents in your hands, to serve as a security to Mr. Johnstone, in case he should require them? _A._ Yes. _Q._ Is it your usual practice, when letters of that sort are sent to you, to make the sort of endorsement you have done when you lay the letters by? _A._ It is. _Lord Ellenborough._ I only asked him as to the inclosure. If I received a letter, I should endorse the date of my receiving it as authenticating the fact; but I should not put the endorsement of the date upon the enclosure, for I know nothing of the date, whether it was received on that day or not; the gentlemen of the jury know whether that is the habit of business or not. _A Juryman._ Is the date you have endorsed upon the enclosure, the date of your receiving it or the date of the letter? _A._ The date of the letter. _Lord Ellenborough._ Certainly it is not regular to authenticate the date of a letter, to which you are not privy; that is all my observation upon it. _Mr. Scarlett._ Besides those plans you now produce, do you know whether there were other and subordinate plans drawn for the details of that same scheme? _A._ Yes, there were. [_Examined by Mr. Park._] _Q._ You have been a great while the attorney of Mr. De Berenger, and known to him? _A._ Five or six years. _Q._ Were you known to him before you were known to Mr. Cochrane Johnstone? _A._ Yes. _Q._ Did you become security for the Rules for this gentleman before you knew Mr. Cochrane Johnstone? _A._ Some months. _Q._ Then it was not at Mr. Cochrane Johnstone's desire that you became a surety for the Rules for this person? _A._ Certainly not. _Q._ Was Mr. Cochrane, who, I understand from Mr. Brushoft, was your co-surety, any relation
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268  
269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

letter

 

Johnstone

 

Cochrane

 

letters

 

Ellenborough

 

received

 
Scarlett
 
Berenger
 

receiving

 

security


Certainly

 

surety

 

enclosure

 

endorsement

 

authenticate

 

refers

 

details

 

attorney

 

scheme

 
Examined

Besides

 

observation

 

produce

 

subordinate

 

desire

 

person

 

relation

 

Brushoft

 
understand
 

months


differently

 

regular

 

gentleman

 

business

 

require

 
practice
 

instance

 

contents

 

documents

 

enclose


gentlemen

 
endorsed
 

Juryman

 

regularly

 

receive

 

inclosure

 
generally
 

endorse

 

authenticating

 
period