FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56  
57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   >>   >|  
concords and inelegance of style. Sec. 3. Terms are either Simple or Composite: that is to say, they may consist either of a single word, as 'Chaucer,' 'civilisation'; or of more than one, as 'the father of English poetry,' or 'modern civilised nations.' Logicians classify words according to their uses in forming propositions; or, rather, they classify the uses of words as terms, not the words themselves; for the same word may fall into different classes of terms according to the way in which it is used. (Cf. Mr. Alfred Sidgwick's _Distinction and the Criticism of Beliefs_, chap. xiv.) Thus words are classified as Categorematic or Syncategorematic. A word is Categorematic if used singly as a term without the support of other words: it is Syncategorematic when joined with other words in order to constitute the subject or predicate of a proposition. If we say _Venus is a planet whose orbit is inside the Earth's_, the subject, 'Venus,' is a word used categorematically as a simple term; the predicate is a composite term whose constituent words (whether substantive, relative, verb, or preposition) are used syncategorematically. Prepositions, conjunctions, articles, adverbs, relative pronouns, in their ordinary use, can only enter into terms along with other words having a substantive, adjectival or participial force; but when they are themselves the things spoken of and are used substantively (_suppositio materialis_), they are categorematic. In the proposition, _'Of' was used more indefinitely three hundred years ago than it is now_, 'of' is categorematic. On the other hand, all substantives may be used categorematically; and the same self-sufficiency is usually recognised in adjectives and participles. Some, however, hold that the categorematic use of adjectives and participles is due to an ellipsis which the logician should fill up; that instead of _Gold is heavy_, he should say _Gold is a heavy metal_; instead of _The sun is shining_, _The sun is a body shining_. But in these cases the words 'metal' and 'body' are unmistakable tautology, since 'metal' is implied in gold and 'body' in sun. But, as we have seen, any of these kinds of word, substantive, adjective, or participle, may occur syncategorematically in connection with others to form a composite term. Sec. 4. Most terms (the exceptions and doubtful cases will be discussed hereafter) have two functions, a denotative and a connotative. A term's denotative fun
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56  
57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
substantive
 

categorematic

 

Categorematic

 

shining

 

Syncategorematic

 

composite

 

categorematically

 

adjectives

 

relative

 
syncategorematically

participles

 

subject

 

predicate

 

proposition

 

classify

 

denotative

 

sufficiency

 
discussed
 
substantives
 
functions

recognised

 

connotative

 

suppositio

 

materialis

 

indefinitely

 

hundred

 

adjective

 

participle

 
tautology
 

substantively


implied
 
logician
 

unmistakable

 
exceptions
 
doubtful
 
connection
 

ellipsis

 

simple

 
Logicians
 
forming

propositions
 

classes

 

Distinction

 
Criticism
 
Beliefs
 

Sidgwick

 

Alfred

 

nations

 

civilised

 

Simple