FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42  
43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   >>   >|  
, that fruit is not yet ripe on my tree. I ask you, therefore, for the sake of your own question, do you think it wise to pick my apples now? Please answer me in the frankness of personal friendship. With kind regards, I am, very truly yours. [Illustration: Autograph: "Please answer me in the frankness of personal friendship. With kind regards, I am very truly yours. Garfield"] Under date of September 9 Miss Anthony sent a spirited reply: Yours of the 25th ult. has waited all these days that I might carefully consider it. First.--The Republican party did run well for a season in the "line of liberty," but since 1870, its congressional enactments, majority reports, Supreme Court decisions, and now its presidential platform, show a retrograde movement--not only for women but for colored men--limiting the power of the national government in the protection of United States citizens against the injustice of the States, until what we gained by the sword is lost by political surrenders. We need nothing but a Democratic administration to demonstrate to all Israel and the sun the fact, the sad fact, that all is lost by the Republican party. I mean, of course, the one vital point of national supremacy in the protection of United States citizens in the enjoyment of their right to vote, and the punishment of States or individuals thereof, for depriving citizens of the exercise of that right. The first and fatal mistake was in ceding to Rhode Island the right to "abridge" the suffrage to foreign born men; and to all the States to "deny" it to women, in direct violation of the principle of _national supremacy_. From that time, inch by inch, point by point has been surrendered, until it is only in name that the Republican party is the party of national supremacy. Grant did not protect the negro's ballot in the presidential election of 1876--Hayes can not in 1880--nor will Garfield be able to do so in 1884--for the "scepter has departed from Judah." Second.--For the candidate of a party to add to the discussions of the contest an issue unauthorized or unnoted in its platform, when that issue is one vital to its very life, it seems to me would be the grandest act imaginable. For doing that very thing, with regard to the protection of the negroes of the South
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42  
43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

States

 

national

 

supremacy

 

citizens

 

Republican

 
protection
 

platform

 

United

 

personal

 

friendship


frankness
 

Please

 

answer

 

presidential

 

Garfield

 

surrendered

 

principle

 
violation
 

direct

 

mistake


individuals

 

thereof

 

depriving

 

punishment

 

enjoyment

 

exercise

 
Island
 
abridge
 

suffrage

 
ceding

foreign

 

unnoted

 

unauthorized

 
discussions
 

contest

 

grandest

 

regard

 

negroes

 
imaginable
 

candidate


Second

 

election

 

ballot

 

protect

 

departed

 

scepter

 
carefully
 
question
 

liberty

 

season